
Originally Posted by
Odysseus
Actually, Hitler came much closer to winning the war than you think. First, he abandoned his invasion plans of Britain at a point when the luftwaffe had reduced the RAF to the point where they were on the verge of collapse. If Hitler had kept up the Blitz for a few more weeks, he'd have had air supremacy and the invasion would have been successful. Instead, he called it off and prepared to invade Russia. The second error that he made was not reinforcing Rommel in North Africa. Rommel had routed the British repeatedly, but was hamstrung by logistics. Had he been given some of the materiale that went to Russia, he could have broken through to Egypt and then the Middle Eastern oil fields, and he could have then driven up through the Caucasus into the middle of the USSR, which would have prevented Stalin's movement of the Soviet production facilities to the east and destroyed the Red Army in a great pincer movement. And, it would have divided Britain from its colonies in Asia and Africa, further crippling the British war effort.
After Pearl Harbor, Germany could have declined to declare war on the US, delaying American entry into the war, and would have limited the amount of Lend/Lease equipment that the US sent to Russia and Britain. Finally, a German conquest of Britain would have meant that iwhen the US did enter the war against Germany, we would not have had a staging area in Europe, protected by the English Channel, and within bombing range of Germany.
Germany lost the war because Hitler made some extremely poor strategic decisions. We won because those decisions gave us the time to build up the armed forces that we'd neglected between the wars.
Given these scenarios, the post-WWII world after a German victory would look a lot like the post-WWII Cold War, with the US and Germany facing off over the Atlantic, and jockeying for power in Asia with a defeated Japan as a base of operations. There would not have been a communist state in China, North Korea or Vietnam, but there might have been fascist states in some of those countries. Many of our same elites would be as sympathetic to the fascists as they were to the communists, and we'd have the same problems with them that we had during the Cold War. As for what the nations under Nazi control would be like, the Germans differed from the Soviets in that their ideology, being racial as well as economic, demanded the elimination of anyone who wasn't a card-carrying Aryan, so their policies would have been pretty much what we saw in Poland, where they reduced the native population to a bare subsistence level with the intent of eventually eliminating them. Europe would have been gradually reduced to ethnic Germans and related peoples, and the death camps would have been expanded and maintained throughout the intervening decades. It would have been a horror beyond what they accomplished during WWII, with billions killed instead of millions. For that DUmmie to compare us to the Nazis is despicable and grotesque.