The Great Robbery of Wage-Earners

[Rockntractor]

I no more did than the foolish ones who nominated someone who could not beat him and betrayed Conservativism.

[Molon Labe]

since you derailed the thread why not continue.

[NJCardFan]

I no more did than the foolish ones who nominated someone who could not beat him and betrayed Conservativism.

So in other words you were willing to allow Obama to get re-elected so he can pursue his uber leftist agenda unchecked in order to show yourself to be morally superior. Thanks guy. Thanks to people like you, we are now on a fast track to destruction. But now you're trying to make yourself feel better by saying that a Romney administration would have been no different than Obama. You couldn't be more wrong.

[marv]

Ah, but there's the extention of unemployment bennies. That'll put stimulus money back into the economy, won't it?

Uhhh, it might put money into pockets for a while, but the loss of productivity by people not working has the combined effect of more wealth going going down the drain for a net loss to the economy. Shit-for-brains Pelosi said unemployment payments would "create more jobs". In effect, it's Obama and the Democrats saying that your labors aren't worth crap! Anybody wanna guess why the GDP is going to hell in a hand basket?

And it doesn't take rocket science to figger that out. Even a skool dropout like me can do it! In effect, it's Obama and the Democrats saying that your labors aren't worth shit!

BTW, I have a bridge in Brooklin that I'd like to.........

[Molon Labe]

So in other words you were willing to allow Obama to get re-elected so he can pursue his uber leftist agenda unchecked in order to show yourself to be morally superior. Thanks guy. Thanks to people like you, we are now on a fast track to destruction. But now you're trying to make yourself feel better by saying that a Romney administration would have been no different than Obama. You couldn't be more wrong.

Republicans have the majority in Congress. They can take action against anything the POTUS does. Why haven't they? Why haven't they signed onto and rammed through the numerous pieces of legislation introduced by legitimate Conservatives repealing this ?

You know why? Because they don't mind raising your taxes either because most of them like their own welfare programs.

Equally complicit in the destruction. But nevermind that right?

[Rockntractor]

since you derailed the thread why not continue.

This is a fallacy, you do not know with certainty what Romney would have done, yet we did with certainty know what Obama would do, and you have the gall to complain about it after sitting on your ass and doing nothing in your power to prevent it.

[Rockntractor]

since you derailed the thread why not continue.

[FlaGator]

I no more did than the foolish ones who nominated someone who could not beat him and betrayed Conservativism.

In a couple of months from now, I would have much rather be debating the economy's performance (or lack there of) under Romney than the economic destruction of Obama. If a few people would have put their personal bias aside and made getting rid of Obama the main task at hand then things might be different today. You basically put your interests head of the country's. Would Romney done a better job? Don't know. Would Obama wise up, that was a certaintly not going to happen and you knew that on election day.

[Novaheart]

Republicans have the majority in Congress. They can take action against anything the POTUS does. Why haven't they? Why haven't they signed onto and rammed through the numerous pieces of legislation introduced by legitimate Conservatives repealing this ?

You know why? Because they don't mind raising your taxes either because most of them like their own welfare programs.

Equally complicit in the destruction. But nevermind that right?

Bump for oh no you deh-ent.

[Molon Labe]

In a couple of months from now, I would have much rather be debating the economy's performance (or lack there of) under Romney than the economic destruction of Obama. If a few people would have put their personal bias aside and made getting rid of Obama the main task at hand then things might be different today. You basically put your interests head of the country's. Would Romney done a better job? Don't know. Would Obama wise up, that was a certaintly not going to happen and you knew that on election day.

Approx. 100 million eligible voters did not vote this year for whatever reason. Voting in the POTUS election was down by about 5 million

Romney lost by over 5 million votes because he said "no thank you" and "get lost" to the Tea party and libertarian wings of the GOP.

So if I voted then Romney is now roughly 4,999,900 votes closer.

It's time to hold the PARTY accountable and stop holding everyone else. I wish people were equally upset with Party bosses who put THEIR personal interests and power ahead of the country as some of you are with one voter.

Rock...love ya man...but your argument here consists of

1. Meme pics
2. Nuh Uh.



Yawn


This is about getting our guys in gear to repeal this crap in Congress the way it rightfully should be.

What are YOU doing to make that happen?