Bad news for SR

[Adam Wood]

It seems there's been a setback on dealing with that Rebel Alliance.

[JB]

Barry Admin response:

The Administration shares your desire for job creation and a strong national defense, but a Death Star isn't on the horizon. Here are a few reasons:

•The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000. We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it.

•The Administration does not support blowing up planets.

•Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship?

1) Yeah, if government does it. We need to look private sector. And the deficit thing? "Ha" is all I can say about that.
2) Hmmm...maybe.
3) That's funny.

[Odysseus]

Barry Admin response:

1) Yeah, if government does it. We need to look private sector. And the deficit thing? "Ha" is all I can say about that.
2) Hmmm...maybe.
3) That's funny.

This is why we need to start with star destroyers.


Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

[JB]

This is why we need to start with star destroyers.

Texas should start building one, they were denied their request to secede.

[Janice]

No matter what advanced defense technology we develop teh Ruler would give it away to our enemies as fast as we made it. Look at our Drone technology which is conveniently lost (downed) in Iran, China, the Indian Ocean and everywhere else he can think of.

Kind of makes ya think of Clinton... on steroids.

[SarasotaRepub]

I saw this earlier, I am most displeased...

[JB]