01-18-2013, 03:57 PM
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
The rest of it's a bit off, but then it would be, wouldn't it? I can't believe that this person thinks that being diagnosed bipolar wasn't already a "black mark in his permanent record file". I don't want to hurt anyones feelings, but I pretty much avoid people that I suspect of being seriously medicated or needing it. I have had to deal with them in the past, and I simply do not have the patience or understanding to do it. When I advertised for a renter, I put it in the ad: "Not seeking a person who is on (or ought to be on) psychiatric drugs."
#12 This poor schmuck just can't win...01-18-2013, 05:54 PM
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 11:04 AM
Denninmi (4,989 posts)
So, why are all of the women I meet out of my league? And usually unavailable.
Probably because, if I were playing for an NCAA team, it would be about a "Class F" school.
I think I need more self-confidence in this area of my life, too.
I would like to at least make an effort, it's been a long dry spell, if you know what I mean. Really long.
What? Can't even score by playing the sympathy card?What do you call an arrogant bully that can never admit it when he's wrong? Mr. President.
01-23-2013, 09:13 PM
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
Actually, I do have a question. If someone has been treated for depression or anxiety or some other common disorder, and has taken meds at some point, does that mean this person can't own a gun? I always wondered about this.
01-24-2013, 12:57 AM
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
Depending upon the state and/or locality, if you were depressed after a divorce or your mother died or something and your shrink put you on Paxil for a few weeks, this may or may not get reported and result in a red flag on a background check. In theory, shrinks are only supposed to report this if you have made overt threats of violence (even in confidence), but in practice that is very hard to pin down, so some will report pretty much anyone who has ever been given Xanax.
None of this means an automatic complete denial of gun purchase. There is a rather extensive appeals process involved in red-flagged background checks. This is why Obama was lying when he claimed that 1.4 million (or however many it was) people who shouldn't have gotten guns were prevented from doing so by those same background checks. Out of those, something like 87% were red-flagged because the name was similar to someone else who actually was barred from owning guns. I can't find the article now, but IIRC, out of all of the background checks run since 1994, only something like 12,000 people have actually been prevented from having a gun because they actually shouldn't have had a gun. Virtually all of the rest were just put through extra hassle because the federal government, in their infinite wisdom and efficiency, screwed up the paperwork and needlessly denied someone from being able to get a gun.
Crazy people generally don't go through background checks. They are usually too paranoid. Adam Lanza likely would have passed a background check had he been old enough to legally purchase a handgun. He refused to go through a state background check for a rifle, almost certainly because he was crazy and paranoid. The crazy who shot up Virginia Tech was the very rare exception to this.Olde-style, states' rights conservative. Ask if this concept confuses you.
01-24-2013, 05:09 AM
I simply choose to have pre tax dollars taken out of my paycheck every week while I have co workers bitch that they can't afford to go to the doctor because they have no insurance. Of course these same co workers have pay tv, internet, cell phones for every child's ear, and go out to lunch every day....
Of course they can't afford insurance. My health insurnace costs me less then they spend on smokes.
01-24-2013, 10:17 AM
" To the world you are just one more person, but to a rescued pet, you are the world."
"A Nation of Sheep Breeds a Government of Wolves!"
01-24-2013, 11:23 AM
There aren't many employers that offer Blue Cross anymore to their employees, because it is expensive to purchase. If I had chose that over Blue Care Network (Blue Cross's PPO), I'd still have it but would have to pay more each paycheck than I do for BCN. Newer employees don't have it as a choice, and I can't choose it now.
But I should have said people with Blue Cross and rich people with cash. Mainly, I singled out BC because it is an old-school plan, in which the customer can call whatever doctor he wants to call, without being referred by a family doctor or from the community mental health intake agency (for that kind of specialist). Most people don't have insurance like that anymore, for better or worse.
01-24-2013, 12:29 PM
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
No. The fact that I took medication for depression is privileged information between me and my doctor.
Actually, I took up this question with my doctor when I was "required" to list all medications when applying for my Commercial Driver License. I thought - as many do - that there was a way someone could back check and see if I was telling the truth. He said no, and if anyone were to find out without me telling them, there would be big trouble. I am the only source of information; that's why they "require" me to tell them.
I said "No" on the form. And I always answer 'no' to the question, "Have you ever.....?"
01-24-2013, 12:51 PM
When Obamacare is all in place he advised that there will no longer essentially be any "doctor patient privilege" as the government will have access to everything....
It doesn't take much imagination to envision where this is all going to eventually go......
He further stated that Obamacare is set up by the Democrats very shrewdly, and is implemented over a long period of time, so until it's all in place patients will not be aware of the effects.......kinda like "boiling a frog".......except he states that when it's done people will not like the result, as the health care system will be in a shambles, and there will be very few doctors left in practice. He further stated that no intelligent person is going to subject themselves to eight years of intensive training to work for what the government is going to compensate them for their work. All that will be left are the incompetents, immigrants, and elderly physicians that are willing to work for peanuts.
Healthcare for all........yes (sorta)......
World-class quality healthcare for all......most assuredly no........
Last edited by TVDOC; 01-24-2013 at 01:11 PM.
01-24-2013, 01:59 PM
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
I am counting on inefficiencies of the system to protect me, and I think I'll be OK. I'm still not going to tell everything about me. My thinking is, "if they can find out so easily then why do they ask and require me to answer?".
But my case was a simple case of routine clinical depression. No violence, no suicidal tendencies. I am very glad that I sought treatment, and would still encourage others to seek help when they have problems with "draggin' ass depression". The problem the government is causing now, is "Oh shit! If I seek treatment, what will that do to my future?"
And that, Dear Friends, is a sad thought, indeed.
In the old days, doctors could tell pretty much whoever asked about your medications. Then, he could tell almost no one. Pretty soon, he will be forced to tell the government who will then tell everyone!
Argh. Just, Argh.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|