Results 1 to 10 of 13

Threaded View

  1. #1 U.N. Drone Investigator: If Facts Lead to U.S. War Crimes, So Be It 
    Senior Member Jim54's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    East Texas
    Posts
    600

    Wed Jan 30, 2013, 08:24 AM

    green for victory (303 posts)


    http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022282509




    U.N. Drone Investigator: If Facts Lead to U.S. War Crimes, So Be It






    Ben Emmerson wants to be clear: He’s not out to ban flying killer robots used by the CIA or the U.S. military. But the 49-year-old British lawyer is about to become the bane of the drones’ existence, thanks to the United Nations inquiry he launched last week into their deadly operations.

    Emmerson, the United Nations’ special rapporteur for human rights and counterterrorism, will spend the next five months doing something the Obama administration has thoroughly resisted: unearthing the dirty secrets of a global counterterrorism campaign that largely relies on rapidly proliferating drone technology. Announced on Thursday in London, it’s the first international inquiry into the drone program, and one that carries the imprimatur of the world body. By the next session of the United Nations in the fall, Emmerson hopes to provide the General Assembly with an report on 25 drone strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and Palestine where civilian deaths are credibly alleged.

    That carries the possibility of a reckoning with the human damage left by drones, the first such witnessing by the international community. Accountability, Emmerson tells Danger Room in a Monday phone interview, “is the central purpose of the report.” He’s not shying away from the possibility of digging up evidence of “war crimes,” should the facts point in that direction. But despite the Obama administration’s secrecy about the drone strikes to date, he’s optimistic that the world’s foremost users of lethal drone tech will cooperate with him.



    In conversation, Emmerson, who’s served as special rapporteur since 2011, doesn’t sound like a drone opponent or a drone skeptic. He sounds more like a drone realist. “Let’s face it, they’re here to stay,” he says, shortly after pausing to charge his cellphone during a trip to New York to prep for his inquiry. “This technology, as I say, is a reality. It is cheap, both in economic terms and in the risk to the lives of the service personnel who are from the sending state....>>MORE

    http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013...drone-inquiry/
    My, my how things have changed! President Bush's use of drones = war crimes. Obama's use of same = ...crickets? And I forsee a pizza in the OP's future for daring to mention The Won's drone war. Interesting...not one reponse to the OP on DU so far at the time of posting this here.


    Update. Still not one response on DU. I can only imagine how hot the thread would be if President Bush were still in office. The hypocrisy is truly sickening.
    Last edited by Jim54; 01-30-2013 at 11:32 AM.
    "Asakatsu Magatsu"

    True victory is victory over oneself.

    ~ Morihei Ueshiba O-Sensei ~
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •