#1 Heartbreaking!02-02-2013, 09:36 PM
Stars without the warpaint
http://www.foxnews.com/slideshow/ent...tures#slide=33The difference between pigs and people is that when they tell you you're cured it isn't a good thing.
02-03-2013, 01:46 AM
A few of them actually look better without all the war paint on. But Jennifer Gardner is unrecognizable without it.
" To the world you are just one more person, but to a rescued pet, you are the world."
"A Nation of Sheep Breeds a Government of Wolves!"
02-03-2013, 01:00 PM
The biggest difference is the eye makeup.
Without it ... they are all, with a few exceptions, washed out and haggard looking.
Eye make up defines and even adds sparkle to the eyes. It really does. Try putting eye makeup on just one eye, and see which side of the face looks more alive.
~ ABCPROUD DEPLORABLE
American By Choice ~ 1980
02-03-2013, 02:26 PM
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- South Florida
Most of the ladies look fine, but Pam Anderson without the cake is one ugly broad.
02-03-2013, 05:36 PM
A lot of them are butter faces anyway so it doesn't matter but some look good even without makeup.The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
02-03-2013, 05:38 PM
Only Katie Holmes and Brooke Shields look good without.Be Not Afraid.
02-04-2013, 12:52 PM
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Northern Virginia
I don't know who about half of them are with OR without."Today, [the American voter] chooses his rulers as he buys bootleg whiskey, never knowing precisely what he is getting, only certain that it is not what it pretends to be." - H.L. Mencken
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|