Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1 Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on Americans 
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    42,057
    By Michael Isikoff
    National Investigative Correspondent, NBC News

    A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” -- even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S.

    The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News, provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects, including those aimed at American citizens, such as the September 2011 strike in Yemen that killed alleged al-Qaida operatives Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan. Both were U.S. citizens who had never been indicted by the U.S. government nor charged with any crimes.

    The secrecy surrounding such strikes is fast emerging as a central issue in this week’s hearing of White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan, a key architect of the drone campaign, to be CIA director. Brennan was the first administration official to publicly acknowledge drone strikes in a speech last year, calling them “consistent with the inherent right of self-defense.” In a separate talk at the Northwestern University Law School in March, Attorney General Eric Holder specifically endorsed the constitutionality of targeted killings of Americans, saying they could be justified if government officials determine the target poses “an imminent threat of violent attack.”
    Read More>http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news...americans?lite
    The difference between pigs and people is that when they tell you you're cured it isn't a good thing.
    http://i.imgur.com/FHvkMSE.jpg
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2 Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on Americans 
    Senior Ape Articulate_Ape's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NJ, Exit Only
    Posts
    7,953
    The creep is slow. Like boiling a frog.
    "Our president delivered his State of the Union message to Congress. That is one of the things his contract calls for -- to tell congress the condition of the country. This message, as I say, is to Congress. The rest of the people know the condition of the country, for they live in it, but Congress has no idea what is going on in America, so the president has to tell 'em." ~ Will Rogers
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3 Re: Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on Americans 
    LTC Member Odysseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    FT Belvoir, VA
    Posts
    15,638
    The Constitutional rationale is simple, but nobody in either party will address the fact that those American citizens actively fighting for al Qaeda are levying war against the United States and that we have the duty to defend ourselves. Declared wars are a lot easier to fight because there's no ambiguity about who the enemy is.

    Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
    --Odysseus
    Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.

    Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    CU Royalty JB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,983
    Splash some water on a guys face? Oh noooooeeeeessssss we can't do that.

    Kill him? Sure, why not.

    Barry makes Bush look like Mother Teresa. Kill Baby, Kill should be his new tagline.
    Be Not Afraid.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5 Re: Justice Department memo reveals legal case for drone strikes on Americans 
    LTC Member Odysseus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    FT Belvoir, VA
    Posts
    15,638
    Quote Originally Posted by JB View Post
    Splash some water on a guys face? Oh noooooeeeeessssss we can't do that.

    Kill him? Sure, why not.

    Barry makes Bush look like Mother Teresa. Kill Baby, Kill should be his new tagline.
    I guess that waterboarding is okay if you drown the guy. :what:

    Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
    --Odysseus
    Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.

    Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    42,057
    Quote Originally Posted by Odysseus View Post
    I guess that waterboarding is okay if you drown the guy. :what:

    Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
    As long as their is equal representation in the drownings according to the demographics of the area.
    The difference between pigs and people is that when they tell you you're cured it isn't a good thing.
    http://i.imgur.com/FHvkMSE.jpg
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member DumbAss Tanker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    2,651
    Quote Originally Posted by Odysseus View Post
    The Constitutional rationale is simple, but nobody in either party will address the fact that those American citizens actively fighting for al Qaeda are levying war against the United States and that we have the duty to defend ourselves. Declared wars are a lot easier to fight because there's no ambiguity about who the enemy is.
    Yes...but of course under that rationale, there is no legal distinction between actions to kill our enemies on American soil vs. overseas, just a policy one. I suspect the current Administration would very much prefer to never have to address that point publicly.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •