Peter doesn't give a crap what the constitution says, if he was honest he would admit he would like all guns confiscated.
These cowards won't try the legal means of taking guns like an amendment or repealing the second amendment because they know that is not what the people want, so instead they lie twist and take away from the context the true meaning of the constitution.
This is why he can't give a clear and logical answer, he has none, his side of the debate is based on lies and dishonesty. Go to Cuba or Venezuela you worthless little communist fuck, you will fool no one here.
Secondly Peter the proposed ban isn't for assAult rifles, it is for scary LOOKING semi-automatic weapons... ( I know you don't care about that distinction )
Third, Peter.... AN idiot, against a military force, armed with an Abrams tank is no match either. However 10,000, 50,000, a million armed with their rifles, hand guns or pointy sticks will make a force take notice.... hence the Second Amendment.
You obviously have no understanding for history or the context for the writing of the Constitution. Because if you did, you wouldn't be arguing this silly point.
You are exactly what the Founders feared, a blissfully uninformed twit, that has no understanding of freedom or what it takes to keep it...
This is going nowhere, apparently that is peters trademark.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|