Results 11 to 20 of 34
|
-
02-22-2013, 09:27 PM
Any of those who were on the other side of that argument are now free to admit that they were wrong.
Same as that lack of doctors thread I started. I don't really expect you to go in and argue your point. Liberals post lies, get called on it, are shown the truth and then are never heard from again until it's time to tell another lie in another thread.
It's so tedious and predictable. Just like Barry.Be Not Afraid.
-
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 10,192
-
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 10,192
02-22-2013, 11:33 PM
It's interesting that when gay rights groups invoke Loving v Virginia (interracial marriage) they are told that the one has nothing to do with the other. But when some fringe group is attributed to have used gay rights as a supportive principle then the relationship is unquestioned.
The issue of legal incest and how it is defined has been in play for 2000 years. Egyptians married siblings and Romans didn't. By the 14th century the Pope (back when anyone cared) decreed that incest was marriage within the sixth degree. IN some states first cousin marriage is legal but double first cousin marriage is illegal. IN Utah first cousins can marry, but only if the female is past child bearing years.
I wonder how the offspring of serial single mothers know they aren't marrying a sibling. I have to wonder if it matters given the random rutting of those who went west in the 19th century.While you were hanging yourself , on someone else's words
Dying to believe in what you heard
I was staring straight into the shining sun
-
02-22-2013, 11:40 PM
In 1996 President Gordon B. Hinckley held a regional conference in Berlin as part of a five- nation European tour. At the beginning of the year 2000 Germany had 36,303 members living in 14 stakes and 188 wards and branches.
http://globalmormonism.byu.edu/?page_id=53Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness;
Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!
21 Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes
And clever in their own sight! Isaiah 5:20-21 NASB
-
02-23-2013, 05:29 PM
As pointed out, the Greens are not a fringe group, they are one of the largest political parties in Germany, and have affiliates throughout the world. Second, The state of Virginia's arguments in Loving vs. VA were based on discredited theories of biological racial differences. When you have discredited the theories that there are significant biological differences between men and women, or that incestuous couplings produce all manner of genetic abnormalities, we will be more than happy to give those arguments a fair hearing.
So, you're okay with incest? Seriously?
They may, but it isn't Mormons who are lobbying for polygamous relationships, it's Muslims and leftists.--Odysseus
Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.
Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
-
02-23-2013, 05:42 PM
Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness;
Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!
21 Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes
And clever in their own sight! Isaiah 5:20-21 NASB
-
-
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 10,192
02-24-2013, 01:38 AM
Merely pointing out that it has been legal at one time for siblings (and other close relations) to marry, and illegal at other times for fifth cousins to wed. By traditional definitions, you and I by virtue of living in Virginia and Florida are 'okay with incest'. My great great grandfather's first wife died in childbirth and he then married her sister. That's incest in Scotland.
Of course none of this has anything to do with gay people getting married, but that apparently doesn't matter.While you were hanging yourself , on someone else's words
Dying to believe in what you heard
I was staring straight into the shining sun
-
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 10,192
02-24-2013, 01:40 AM
While you were hanging yourself , on someone else's words
Dying to believe in what you heard
I was staring straight into the shining sun
-
02-24-2013, 02:11 AM
Nice straw men. First, pointing out that incest has been legal for siblings in some cultures in this context implies acceptance of the practice. Notice that you have not stated that you oppose it. Second, the issue, as I keep telling you, is that when you radically redefine marriage based on the whims of the moment, you open the floodgates to all manner of new definitions of "marriage", from gay marriage to polygamy to incest. If two men can marry, and adopt, or two women, why not a man and two women? Or three? Or four? Why not have communal adoptions? After all, the Mansons called themselves a family, too. You keep moving the goalposts to where you want them, but you aren't the only one who wants to move them, and the others have no compunctions about knocking them down entirely.
--Odysseus
Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.
Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
How Fox News characterize a story
Today, 03:37 PM in Best/Worst of DU/Discussionist