View Poll Results: Should the taxpayers bailout the banks?
- 18. You may not vote on this poll
No, businesses need to be able to fail even if it is painful
Yes, the taxpayers should step up to prevent recession.
I have no clue and am not going to pretend like I do.
Thread: Bailout? Yes or No?
09-26-2008, 11:57 PM
Unfortunately, I have to agree with Bill O Riley, this mess has gotten too big, and the government needs to step in. I don't like it, they are going to screw it up no matter who comes in next year, but the hit to the nation is going to be to big to let business pull out on their own. Hopefully, we will learn from the mess, but I'm not laying any money on it.Romans 6:18 You have been set free from sin and have become slaves to righteousness.
Differences between Obama and God: God's plan to save us is actually written down for people to read. Rush Limbaugh.
My blog: How Things Look From Here Politics, religion, random stuff, now on Wednesdays!
09-27-2008, 12:18 AM
: “Grow your own dope. Plant a liberal.”
” I wondered why the rock was getting larger. Then it hit me.
09-27-2008, 12:39 AM
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
You know, I hoe everyone that wants the govt to do nothing has plenty of guns, ammo and food set aside. And I hope you got enough land to sustain yourself for a while.
I hate this shit. But letting the nation slide into a full scale depression isn't my idea of fun.
JohnGuest09-27-2008, 03:00 AM
Originally Posted by expat-pattaya
In other words, the nation is in for recession or depression no matter what congress does. What do you think the bailed out financial institutions are going to do with the bail out cash? They are going to re-lend it of course, to try to pull in interest on the cash. At the same time, the nation's consumers will be feeling the one-two punch of the inflation created by the $700bn infusion, coupled with the tax hike it's going to take to cover the toxic debt the government now owns. Meanwhile, the investors will be feeling the crunch of a drop in interest rates in an effort to entice borrowers to borrow, the investor's money won't grow, the market will remain volatile, and it's likely that many will pull their portfolio's all together. With that kind of pressure on the consumers and the lending system, it stands to reason that there could very well be another round of 'toxic debt' at the end of this road.
In closing, I'd like to bring up a few points Ron Paul made recently, just to keep this board happy. I know they miss him. :D (After all, as the only man talking about recession during the primaries, he did tell us so).
First of all, the people who claim they have the plan to bring us out of this are the same people who developed the failed 'economic stimulus package', as we can see, it didn't work. They also represent the same organizations that led us to this mess in the first place. It takes a severe level of naivety to believe that those who led us to this end, and already failed once to bring us out of it, will succeed when given a third chance.
Secondly, the U.S. must decide whether we are capitalists or not. This mix and match of capitalism and socialism embodied by Fannie May, Feddie Mac, and the socialist policies that drive them to make unsafe loans clearly doesn't work.
Just to sum up, I have just a rudimentary understanding of national and global economics and I can see these problems plain as day. It's no wonder why many, many economists, bankers, and CEO's of major corporations do not agree with Bernanke & Paulson's plan. The Bernanke/Paulson plan has too many assumptions and it doesn't address the 'What Ifs'. If the lending system does not earn back interest on that $700bn, their plan will fail. To date, I've never seen anyone explain how a bank is to earn back interest on it's bail out cash when the borrower is faced with the inflation, the tax hike, and the lack of investment.
Last edited by John; 09-27-2008 at 02:41 PM.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|