A robotic eye that flies through the air peering at American citizens to see what is taxable and whether they are armed is way over the line and the argument has far surpassed this level, now they are debating whether it should deliver lethal punishment, remotely. the president say's yes to all of the above.
Slippery slope hell, we are in the abyss.
From what I read the drones may be able to tell armaments, but I doubt they can pick up nationalities or ethnicity so it does not know if it is a guy named Ahmed or Billy Bob legally hunting jack rabbits.
Bird hunting target practice......
You imply here that you would stand up and that I don't know what you would do in the circumstance I stated yet you are willing to leave over a post of mine that you think was too severe.
I really don't understand why one post is enough to make you mad to the point of leaving.
Homeland Security's specifications for its drones, built by San Diego-based General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, say they "shall be capable of identifying a standing human being at night as likely armed or not," meaning carrying a shotgun or rifle. They also specify "signals interception" technology that can capture communications in the frequency ranges used by mobile phones, and "direction finding" technology that can identify the locations of mobile devices or two-way radios.
Unless you are up to no good what freedom have you lost?
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|