You didn't really think I'd refute your clim without evidence did you?Even Feinstein doesn't seem to be pushing for this, from what I've seen. Can you show me where Democrats are proposing retroactively applying any possible new regulations?
First off there is no such thing as an "assault" weapon. If that were the case...baseball bats and butter knives would be outlawed as well.an the sale, transfer, importation or manufacturing of about 150 named firearms, plus certain rifles, handguns and shotguns fitted for detachable magazines and having at least one military characteristic.
- Strengthen the 1994 ban by moving from a two- to a one-characteristic test to determine what constitutes an assault weapon.
- Ban firearms with "thumbhole stocks" and "bullet buttons."
- Ban the importation of assault weapons and large-capacity magazines.
- Ban high-capacity ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds.
Many of the above named items that Franken Feinstein is trying to ban are already owned by lawful gun owners. And they would suddenly find themselves in possession of illegal items.
None of the gun grabbing measures that this Administration or the Dems are trying to pull off would have stopped ANY of the recent shootings.
Tell me...if there are already 1,600 federal laws concerning firearms and their ownership and use...what the hell is one more gonna achieve?
You sound very much like a student merely repeating what your clueless teacher has told you.I've been out of school for about a year, though this is a short enough period of time that I can imagine I still sound like a student.