Results 1 to 10 of 21

Hybrid View

  1. #1 Pentagon May Court Martial Soldiers Who Share Christian Faith 
    Destroyer of Worlds Apocalypse's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Locked in a Dungeon, being tortured and LOVING IT!
    Posts
    5,096
    The Pentagon has released a statement confirming that soldiers could be prosecuted for promoting their faith: "Religious proselytization is not permitted within the Department of Defense...Court martials and non-judicial punishments are decided on a case-by-case basis...”.

    The statement, released to Fox News, follows a Breitbart News report on Obama administration Pentagon appointees meeting with anti-Christian extremist Mikey Weinstein to develop court-martial procedures to punish Christians in the military who express or share their faith.


    (From our earlier report: Weinstein is the head of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, and says Christians--including chaplains--sharing the gospel of Jesus Christ in the military are guilty of “treason,” and of committing an act of “spiritual rape” as serious a crime as “sexual assault.” He also asserted that Christians sharing their faith in the military are “enemies of the Constitution.”)

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2...hristian-Faith
    Rest In Peace America
    July 4, 1776 - January 20, 2009
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    9,003
    Is putting up a Christmas tree an "act of proselytization"?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Moderator txradioguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bavaria
    Posts
    7,649
    Quote Originally Posted by Elspeth View Post
    Is putting up a Christmas tree an "act of proselytization"?
    It is now. Saying you merely believe in God is next.

    Sent from my Z10 using Tapatalk 2
    In Memory Of My Friend 1st Sgt. Tim Millsap A Co, 70th Eng. Bn. 3rd Bde 1st AD...K.I.A. 25 April 2005

    Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

    To Achieve Ordered Liberty You Must Have Moral Order As Well

    The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member LukeEDay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Happy Valley
    Posts
    2,046
    I am doing some more research on this to make sure it is the case. The only places that are mentioning it are right wing blogs (They mention the same thing Brietbart said). Nothing is mentioned from Fox News or the MSM (Then the MSM probably wouldn't report it because it is something they want). Until I see more from a 'credible' source. I will pass on this and take it as being a story in progress.




    Something else you have to look at here is that they can't ban you from it. Doing so would violate your 1st amendment right, and it is unconstitutional. If doing such would cause you to go through Court Martial proceedings, the line of lawyers wanting to defend you would be huge.

    I love my God, my country, my flag, and my troops ....
    _ WELFARE IS NOT AN ENTITLEMENT! _
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    9,003
    Quote Originally Posted by LukeEDay View Post
    I am doing some more research on this to make sure it is the case. The only places that are mentioning it are right wing blogs (They mention the same thing Brietbart said). Nothing is mentioned from Fox News or the MSM (Then the MSM probably wouldn't report it because it is something they want). Until I see more from a 'credible' source. I will pass on this and take it as being a story in progress.

    I've been looking and have found a few things. Here is something from today:

    Rhetoric heats up in debate over proselytizing in the military

    ...The latest salvo came this week when conservative blogger Todd Starnes wrote on Fox News and the Christian Post that the Pentagon confirmed that "religious proselytization is not permitted within the Department of Defense."

    The regulation is not new. In August, the Air Force issued a policy telling its chaplains that they must balance an airman's right to religious exercise with a prohibition against government establishment of religion. A violation of the policy could result in a court-martial.

    What is new is a recent demand to enforce the rule. It came after a private meeting last week between Pentagon officials and Larry Wilkerson, former chief of staff to Colin Powell, former Ambassador Joe Wilson and civil rights attorney Michael L. "Mikey" Weinstein.

    Conservative Christians are particularly upset that the Department of Defense is taking advice from Weinstein, who heads the Military Religious Freedom Foundation.

    "God help us now when someone with such visceral hatred of conservative Christians — literally tens of millions of Americans — who says sharing this gospel is 'spiritual rape' is helping develop policies for how to deal with Christians in the military," wrote Ken Klukowski, director of the Center for Religious Liberty at Family Research Council.

    He draws his conclusions about Weinstein's view of Christianity from a Huffington Post blog in which Weinstein referred to so-called fundamentalist Christians as monsters, bigots, bandits and evil, among other things.

    Weinstein told Washington Post columnist Sally Quinn that “there is systematic misogyny, anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in the military.” He called such a culture "a national security threat. What is happening (aside from sexual assault) is spiritual rape. And what the Pentagon needs to understand is that it is sedition and treason. It should be punished.”...


    This academic paper from 2009 lists a hodgepodge of events leading up to the concern about "Christian proselytizing". See what you make of it. (One incident looks clearly like anti-semitic bullying and not Christian proselytization.)

    2009 Air Force Academic Paper: THE NEED FOR (MORE) NEW GUIDANCE REGARDING RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION IN THE AIR FORCE

    The Air Force and the other services have recently been forced to deal with several high-visibility religious issues, including those at the service academies, in basic training, at the Pentagon and in deployed locations. Starting with the Air Force, in 2003, the Christian Leadership Ministries published an annual advertisement in the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) base paper, including the statement, “We believe that Jesus Christ is theonly real hope for the world. If you would like to discuss Jesus, feel free to contact one of us!” The signatories included over two hundred USAFA faculty and staff, including a majority of USAFA department heads.1

    In 2004, Christian Embassy, a group established in 1975 to minister to members of Congress, ambassadors, presidential appointees and Pentagon officials2 filmed a promotional video inside the Pentagon showing several generals and senior defense officials talking about the importance of religion in their jobs and lives. In 2007, the Department of Defense Inspector General publicly released a report finding that senior Army and Air Force personnel violated the Joint Ethics Regulation when they participated in the video while in uniform and on active duty.3

    On 28 April 2005, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State sent a multipage complaint to then- Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, documenting what it called systematic and pervasive religious bias and intolerance at the highest levels of USAFA command structure.4 On 2 May 2005, the Acting Secretary of the Air Force directed a team investigation to assess the religious climate at USAFA.5 Also in May 2005, Chaplain (Capt.) Melinda Morton, assigned to USAFA, stated that the religious problem at USAFA “is pervasive.”6

    In June 2005, the Headquarters Review Group Concerning the Religious Climate at [USAFA]
    (Review Group) released its report. The report documented seven specific events of 3 what appeared to be “questionable behavior,” and referred those events for command follow-up. In addition, the Review Group identified nine findings regarding the overall climate and made nine recommendations. The first recommendation was the following: “develop policy guidelines for Air Force commanders and supervisors regarding religious expression.”7

    In July 2005, Chaplain Brig.Gen. Cecil Richardson, then the Deputy Chief of Air Force Chaplains (presently Maj.Gen. and Chief of Air Force Chaplains at the time of publication), stated in a New York Times interview, “We [chaplains] will not proselytize, but we reserve the right to evangelize the unchurched.”8 The distinction, he said, is that proselytizing is trying to convert someone in an aggressive way, while evangelizing is more “ gently” sharing the gospel.9

    On 6 October 2005, USAFA graduate Mikey Weinstein joined four 2004 USAFA graduates in suing the Air Force in federal district court, claiming that USAFA illegally imposed Christianity on cadets at USAFA. The case was dismissed by the judge a year later, who ruled that the plaintiffs had graduated and were thus unable to prove any direct harm.10

    On 25 October 2006, former Navy chaplain Gordon Klingenschimitt filed suit against the Navy in federal district court for, among other claims, violating his First Amendment rights by discouraging him from praying in the name of Jesus. 11 While he was a Navy chaplain, Klingenschmitt’s commander issued him a direct order which instructed him that he could only wear his uniform if conducting a bona-fide religious service. Soon afterward, Klingenschmitt conducted a prayer vigil in uniform outside the White House, followed by a news conference to pressure President Bush to issue an Executive Order regarding military chaplains’ right to pray as they wished. Klingenschmitt was subsequently court-martialed for failing to obey a direct order and was involuntarily separated from the Navy.

    The religious issues continued well into 2008. In February 2008, USAFA was criticized by Muslim and religious freedom organizations for playing host to and paying three speakers who critics say are evangelical Christians pretending to be alleged former Muslim terrorists.13

    On 5 March 2008, Army SPC Jeremy Hall, an atheist, and Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF), a group headed by USAFA grad Mikey Weinstein, filed suit against Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and SPC Hall’s commander, MAJ Freddy Welborn. The suit alleged that SPC Hall was denied his First Amendment right to be free of government sponsored religious activity.14 On 10 October 2008, the plaintiffs dismissed the suit.15

    In August 2008,the Air Force Times interviewed Chief of Air Force Chaplains Maj.Gen. Cecil Richardson. A reporter asked him to respond to a question about whether he wasconcerned that a Christian chaplain who was visited by a troubled airman who wasn’t interested in religion might steer the airman toward Jesus. Chaplain Richardson’s response: “Well, you know, sometimes Jesus is what they need.They’re asking for it.”16

    On 24 September 2008, PVT Michael Handman, a Jewish soldier attending basic training at Fort Benning, GA suffered a beating at the hands of fellow soldiers.17 MRFF, in a 16 October 2008 letter to Secretary Gates, alleged that prior to the beating, PVT Handman was a victim of anti-Semitic actions by his drill sergeants.18...
    Last edited by Elspeth; 05-02-2013 at 12:18 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,161
    MRFF holds that:

    No religion or religious philosophy may be advanced by the United States Armed Forces over any other religion or religious philosophy.

    No member of the United States Armed Forces may be compelled in any way to conform to a particular religion or religious philosophy.

    No member of the United States Armed Forces may be compelled in any way to witness or engage in any religious exercise.

    No member of the military may be compelled to curtail – except in the most limited of military circumstances and when it directly impacts military discipline, morale and the successful completion of a specific military goal – the free exercise of their religious practices or beliefs.

    Students at United States military academies are entitled to the same Constitutional rights pertaining to religious freedoms and the free exercise of those freedoms to which all other members of the United States Armed Forces military are entitled.

    No member of the military may be compelled to endure unwanted religious proselytization, evangelization or persuasion of any sort in a military setting and/or by a military superior or civilian employee of the military.

    The full exercise of religious freedom includes the right not to subscribe to any particular religion or religious philosophy. The so-called “unchurched” cede no Constitutional rights by want of their separation from organized faith.

    It is the responsibility of the military hierarchy to ensure that the free exercise of religious freedoms of all enlisted personnel are respected and served.

    All military personnel have the right to employ appropriate judicial means to protect their religious rights.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Moderator txradioguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bavaria
    Posts
    7,649
    Their mission statement that you so expertly cut and paste from the website sounds all nice and neutral. Looks good on paper and allows donors to feel guilty free when they open up their wallets.

    But it hides the ugly truth about what this "Organization" really believes as bared out by the file quotes of its founder.

    You can try all you want to put lipstick on this pig but it still smells.

    And your defense of this kind of rabid bigotry and attempted subversion of the 1st Amendment is disgusting.

    Sent from my Z10 using Tapatalk 2
    In Memory Of My Friend 1st Sgt. Tim Millsap A Co, 70th Eng. Bn. 3rd Bde 1st AD...K.I.A. 25 April 2005

    Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

    To Achieve Ordered Liberty You Must Have Moral Order As Well

    The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    9,003
    Quote Originally Posted by txradioguy View Post
    Their mission statement that you so expertly cut and paste from the website sounds all nice and neutral. Looks good on paper and allows donors to feel guilty free when they open up their wallets.

    But it hides the ugly truth about what this "Organization" really believes as bared out by the file quotes of its founder.
    The website (that Nova did not care enough to provide a link to) is here. The statements come from the main web page of Mikey Weinstein's organization, and they do look good on paper. But a recent article (not the HuffPo or Breitbart) makes it clear that Mikey has other plans:

    WAOI, Channel 4 (NBC):Pentagon is urged to crack down on religious proselytizing

    ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) - A group called the Military Religious Freedom Foundation is urging the Pentagon to court martial officers whose subordinates feel they're being proselytized.

    MRFF president Mikey Weinstein says even a Christian bumper sticker on an officer's car or a Bible on an officer's desk can amount to "pushing this fundamentalist version of Christianity on helpless subordinates."

    Weinstein and other leaders of his foundation met with top officials at the Pentagon last week.

    The Rev. Ron Crews, who heads the Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty, agrees that faith shouldn't be forced on the lower ranks. But he says evangelical Christians believe that God wants them to share their faith with others.

    He worries that making religion a forbidden topic will discriminate against evangelicals and drive them from the military.

    Crews is asking for "equal time" to share his concerns with Pentagon officials.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •