Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
  1. #21  
    You can also always tell when conservatives are in denial about their candidates' real chances of winning an election. She is considering running for the Senate in Alaska because she knows she can't win a national election.
    Considering the utter imbecile in the WH at the moment?

    The majority of Americans think she's stupid-whether she is or not, that's the opinion.
    Yeah yeah and Pres Bush was AWOL, he organised 9/11, he is a member of the global conspiracy...blah blah blah.....

    You guys like her because she says the things you want to hear. The only people who are going to vote for her are Alaskans and the far right.
    Oh I'd say far more than that, my dear DUmmie. Y'see, after the massive violations of the Constitution carried out by "your hero", Governor Palin willnbe welcomed by a lot more than that, seeing as she doesnt think the US Constitution is something to be trampled upon or ignored.

    Especially the First, Second and Fourth Amendments, not to mention the 10th.

  2. #22  

    Hillary Clinton Exposed Lying in Benghazi Hearings
    Outgoing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was asked on Wednesday at a Senate hearing about the White House official story that the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi sprang from spontaneous protest. Her response: "so what?"

    They lied. That's why it matters. People holdling public office have a duty to tell the truth to the people they represent.

    “What difference does it make [whether American's at Benghazi died from a protest or not]?” That's what Clinton testified Wednesday before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee about the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

    Secretary Clinton was pressed by Senator Ron Johnson (R-Minn.) to explain why the Obama administration stood by an absurd story claiming that four Americans we're murdered in Libya due to a spontaneous protest gone bad.

    Secretary Clinton's response?

    Secretary of State Hilary Clinton - Benghazi testimony

    “With all due respect, the fact is we have four dead Americans. Whether it was because of a protest or because guys outside for a walk one night decided to go kill some Americans. What difference at this point does it make?” Clinton said.

    Really? The indignation card? Really? The “it doesn't matter” card?

    In 1974 Clinton was a member of the impeachment inquiry staff advising the House Committee on the Judiciary during the Watergate scandal. What difference did it make whether it was a burglary or not at that point? All the difference in the world to the American people and the only sitting U.S. president to ever be removed from office (technicality: Nixon resigned before officially being removed – the only sitting president to resign).

    Picking apart her statement “Was it because of protest or because guys outside for a walk one night decide to go kill some Americans,” I don't believe Secretary Clinton is dumb, but she must think everyone else is “guys out for a walk?" And she's still trying to leave a seed of doubt that 'hey, maybe it was a protest.'

    Thanks for playing, but no. We know beyond a shadow of a doubt it was not a protest. An independent State Department investigation (the Pickering Report) led by Thomas Pickering, President George H.W. Bush's U.N. ambassador, confirms that "there was no protest prior to the attacks," contrary to administration's position for several weeks afterward that the attacks arose from a spontaneous demonstration against a YouTube video had gotten out of hand (an extremely low budget video that was released nearly 3 months earlier).

    She goes on to say “it is our job to figure what happened, and prevent it from ever happening again”

    We know now that there were live video feeds. Documents released by the House Oversight Committee show that on the day of the attack (September 11) the White House situation room starts receiving emails at about 1 p.m. that the mission is under hostile surveillance and the Pentagon sends a drone with a video camera which provided real-time video to the White House, the State Department, the Pentagon, and the CIA.

    We know what happened. We even know that an Embassy cable on June 25 expressed fear of rising Islamic extremism in eastern Libya around Benghazi, and noted that the black flag of Al-Qaeda “has been spotted several times flying over government buildings and training facilities.”

    We know the administration received requests for additional security from the embassy and the ambassador himself as early as February. On August 2, Ambassador Stevens sent a cable requesting 11 additional body guards, noting “Host nation security support is lacking and cannot be depended on to provide a safe and secure environment for the diplomatic mission of outreach.”

    These requests for additional security were repeatedly denied.

    We know that they administration lied. We know President Obama repeatedly blamed the attack a Youtube movie. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney lied (both blaming violence on the Youtube video and stating the White House was not “aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. Mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent. That report is false”). Secretary Clinton lied. UN Ambassador Susan Rice lied. The below video shows Secretary Clinton blamed the attacks on the YouTube video on September 14th.

    What difference does it make? Ask Nixon. All the difference in the world. They knew the truth, lied repeatedly about it, and still try to sort-of, maybe sound like it possibly could be. The American people deserve to know the truth. We deserve better of our pubic officials and elected representatives. Character, though scoffed at sometimes, still matters. That's why this matters

  3. #23  
    Senior Member LukeEDay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Happy Valley
    Hillary Clinton was also fired from her law firm over the Watergate Scandal. She lied at that hearing also ...

    I love my God, my country, my flag, and my troops ....

  4. #24  
    Noonwitch: your "candidate" wont run, because she knows full well what will happen the moment she does. She is history, a past tense, and will be the last of the Clintons in public office for a long time. I would not be surprised when she announces she is leaving public life at the end of this farce of a Presidency.

    She will then follow her corrupt, impeached and disbarred ex President husband into the talk circuit, where I am sure the moonbats will line up to fork over their money to listen to her "memoirs".

    I also predict that the DUmmies wont raise a word against the millions they will make, as they are only concerned with "wealth redistribution" when it comes to anyone other than their luvvies, the morons and celebutards of Hollyweird, or utter failures like John "Swiftboat" Kerry and his multimillionare wife.

    If Mr Kerry needs a new career after politics, he could always be cast in the butler's role in a remake of the Addams Family. He is eminently qualified for the part.
    Last edited by Sonnabend; 09-23-2013 at 08:29 AM.

  5. #25  
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    South Florida
    Noonie, you're living in Delusionaland if you think Hillary Benghazigate Clinton has a snowball's chance in hell of winning the nomination, much less the Presidency. She does not have the charisma or likability of Bill Clinton. She's a birkenstock wearing dyke with a mean temper, bad style and shit-mouth that lies every time she's sworn under oath. Bill was a smooth talkin' redneck womanizer who connected with a lot of people, love him or hate him he was more right than any of the democratic presidents we've had. I'm not a fan of Bill Clinton, but if you think Hillary has the same support you're more foolish than I thought.

  6. #26  
    Moderator RobJohnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Southern Nevada
    Quote Originally Posted by noonwitch View Post
    Personally, I was hoping the GOP would get her to run for President in 2016. It would ensure a democratic victory, especially if Hillary is the Dem nominee. Hillary would tear Sarah apart in the debates.

    She could win the seat in Alaska, but that doesn't really say very much about Alaska's voters if she does.

    She can't take back that Katie Couric interview. You can say it was a set up all you want, but everyone who didn't see it in 2008 will get the chance to see it again.

    The GOP can do better than her.
    I would love to see Hillary would seal a victory for the right.

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts