Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Hybrid View

  1. #1 How Long Before Holder Brings Zimmerman Up On Civil Rights Charges? 
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15,912
    Just what the title says. I say within a matter of weeks. Obama isn't one who takes getting egg on his face lightly. Look for Zimmerman to be unpersoned.
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,128
    No way in heck will they bring charges. Not on a weak case such as this
    We're from Philadelphia, We Fight- Chip Kelly
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    41,894
    An offensive move such as bringing charges against those in the federal government who slandered and brought harm on him might be a good course of action before they have a chance to do anything to him.
    How is obama working out for you?
    http://i686.photobucket.com/albums/vv230/upyourstruly/5d569df9-186a-477b-a665-3ea8a8b9b655_zpse9003e54.jpg
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Zoomie djones520's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    10,072
    He won't. Take off the jaded glasses NJ. The jury didn't find him guilty just to forestall riots. A couple hours after the verdict has been made public, there still hasn't been reports of any violence. There will not be any charges on civil rights violations.
    In most sports, cold-cocking an opposing player repeatedly in the face with a series of gigantic Slovakian uppercuts would get you a multi-game suspension without pay.

    In hockey, it means you have to sit in the penalty box for five minutes.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15,912
    Quote Originally Posted by djones520 View Post
    He won't. Take off the jaded glasses NJ. The jury didn't find him guilty just to forestall riots. A couple hours after the verdict has been made public, there still hasn't been reports of any violence. There will not be any charges on civil rights violations.
    Are you saying I don't have reason to be jaded? Are we watching the same administration?
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Fabulous Poster
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    10,161
    I can't believe this bitch on msnbc with the Bette Davis eyes (don't know her name). "Tonight 12 year olds will be crawling in bed with their parents." What the fuck? To listen to a lot of these people they didn't watch the trial or read about it. They are still spouting the same garbage. Still referring to Trayvon as a "little boy" with fucking Skittles.

    They said that this isn't over. That Benjamin Crump is going to file a civil suit. I thought he already collected from the HOA. They said, that the evil Zimmerman can be "forced to testify" in the civil suit. Really? How about he just stipulates to all their claims, gets a 12 million dollar judgement against himself, and then runs right down to the bankruptcy court? Ha!

    I am so sick of these assholes trying to exploit this case. I want to see Rick Scott, Angela Corey, de la Rionda, the other prosecutor, Al Sharpton and Lawrence O'Donnell all unemployed.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Sonnabend
    Guest
    He cant.

    FL law prohibits it.

    Chapter 776: JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE

    776.032 Immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use of force.

    (1) A person who uses force as permitted in s. 776.012, s. 776.013, or s. 776.031 is justified in using such force and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use of such force, unless the person against whom force was used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who was acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a law enforcement officer. As used in this subsection, the term “criminal prosecution” includes arresting, detaining in custody, and charging or prosecuting the defendant.

    (2) A law enforcement agency may use standard procedures for investigating the use of force as described in subsection (1), but the agency may not arrest the person for using force unless it determines that there is probable cause that the force that was used was unlawful.

    (3) The court shall award reasonable attorney’s fees, court costs, compensation for loss of income, and all expenses incurred by the defendant in defense of any civil action brought by a plaintiff if the court finds that the defendant is immune from prosecution as provided in subsection (1).
    Last edited by Sonnabend; 07-14-2013 at 01:36 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    PORCUS MAXIMUS Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    41,894
    Quote Originally Posted by djones520 View Post
    He won't. Take off the jaded glasses NJ. The jury didn't find him guilty just to forestall riots. A couple hours after the verdict has been made public, there still hasn't been reports of any violence. There will not be any charges on civil rights violations.
    It looks like we can put our "jaded glasses" on.
    http://www.conservativeunderground.c...986#post568986
    How is obama working out for you?
    http://i686.photobucket.com/albums/vv230/upyourstruly/5d569df9-186a-477b-a665-3ea8a8b9b655_zpse9003e54.jpg
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15,912
    Quote Originally Posted by djones520 View Post
    He won't. Take off the jaded glasses NJ. The jury didn't find him guilty just to forestall riots. A couple hours after the verdict has been made public, there still hasn't been reports of any violence. There will not be any charges on civil rights violations.
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013...an-civil-case/

    You were saying?
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member Bailey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    6,128
    Quote Originally Posted by NJCardFan View Post
    I don't think they will, they are only going through the motions. If the FBI says there was no racial malice then it should be hard to prove that his civil rights was taken.
    We're from Philadelphia, We Fight- Chip Kelly
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •