Thread: Hassan guilty on all charges
08-23-2013, 08:06 PM--Odysseus
Sic Hacer Pace, Para Bellum.
Before you can do things for people, you must be the kind of man who can get things done. But to get things done, you must love the doing, not the people!
08-23-2013, 11:14 PM
I would want him executed, by any means at all, if I were a family member of the soldiers who were killed or wounded.
Personally, I'll settle for this "workplace violence" to be called what it really was.
An act of terrorism!!! Then get on with what to do with him.PROUD DEPLORABLE
American By Choice ~ 1980
08-23-2013, 11:27 PM
The true acts of treason are being committed by the commander and chief.Pffffffffffffffffffffff! Buh Bye Big Ears
08-23-2013, 11:39 PM
Hasan made his way to the pearly gates. There, he is greeted by George Washington.
"How dare you attack the nation I helped conceive!" yells Mr. Washington, slapping Hasan in the face. Patrick Henry comes up from behind: "You wanted to end the Americans' liberty, so they gave you death!" Henry punches Hasan on the nose. James Madison comes up next, and says, "This is why I allowed the Federal government to provide for the common defense!" He drops a large weight on Hasan's knee.
Hasan is subject to similar beatings from John Randolph of Roanoke, James Monroe and 65 other 18th-century American revolutionaries. As he writhes on the ground, Thomas Jefferson picks him up to hurl him back toward the gate where he is to be judged.
As Hasan sees the entire Cartwright clan approaching, he screams, "This is not what I was promised!"
An angel replies: "I told you there would be 72 Virginians waiting for you. What did you think I said?"
It's not how old you are, it's how you got here.
It's been a long road and not all of it was paved.
A man is but a product of his thoughts. What he thinks, he becomes. Gandhi
08-23-2013, 11:53 PM
So, victims and others are demanding, why is the November 2009 attack at Fort Hood being tried as a case of workplace violence and not as an act of terrorism?
Military law expert Scott L. Silliman says the answer is simple. Because the Uniform Code of Military Justice does not have a punitive article for “terrorism.”
“They really didn’t have an option,” says Silliman, director emeritus of Duke University’s Center on Law, Ethics and National Security in Durham, N.C. “He was an active-duty officer. The crime occurred on a military installation. ... It was obvious he was going to face a court-martial.”
http://www.militarytimes.com/article...Terrorism-not-Pffffffffffffffffffffff! Buh Bye Big Ears
08-24-2013, 12:03 AMPROUD DEPLORABLE
American By Choice ~ 1980
08-24-2013, 02:47 AM
I'm actually conflicted about this. The death penalty is what this traitor wants so he can become a martyr for Islam. I'm almost hoping that they give him life with no possibility of parole.....let him sit in his wheelchair in a 6' x 8' windowless cell for the rest of his worthless life and not give him the satisfaction of becoming a martyr.Solve a man's problem with violence and help him for a day. Teach a man how to solve his problems with violence, help him for a lifetime - Belkar Bitterleaf
Liberalism is what the stupid think is smart.
SonnabendGuest08-24-2013, 04:37 AM
He wasnt convicted as a jihadist..all he is is a common criminal, a murderer.
Pity about the lethal injection, I'd prefer to see him hang.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|