#1 Police accuse Fort Bragg soldier and his wife of making pornography with dogs09-19-2013, 10:11 AM
Police accuse Fort Bragg soldier and his wife of making pornography with dogs
By Nancy McCleary
RAEFORD - A Raeford couple face charges of engaging in sex acts with dogs, filming them and posting the videos on the Internet, police said.
Ruben Chance James Fox and his wife, Amber Nicole Fox, both 23, of the 900 block of East Prospect Avenue, were arrested Monday morning, according to the Raeford Police Department.
They are charged with multiple counts of crimes against nature involving bestiality, disseminating obscene materials and conspiracy, police said.
Amber Fox also is charged with soliciting a crime against nature, police said.
The cybercrimes unit of the Fairfax County Police Department in Virginia contacted Raeford authorities about two weeks ago after videos appeared online showing sex acts with dogs, said Raeford police Maj. Marc Godwin.
Police said the videos were made at the couple's home and shared through a website.
Raeford officers searched the home Friday and seized recording devices and computer hard drives, police said. Officers took two mixed breed dogs and three cats from the home and placed them at a local shelter.
Ruben Fox is a Fort Bragg soldier, Godwin said. He is a member of the 82nd Airborne Division, said Ben Abel, a spokesman for Fort Bragg.
Bail was set at $15,000 each.
Staff writer Nancy McCleary can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 486-3568.
Lends whole new meaning to the term Military Working Dogs.
09-19-2013, 10:16 AM
Just another life style choice that should be accepted cheerfully by the military, these dogs should me getting the same full marriage benefits that other military spouses receive, plus complimentary flea dips.The difference between pigs and people is that when they tell you you're cured it isn't a good thing.
09-19-2013, 10:17 AM
Meh. Foxes, dogs, they're both canids.
09-19-2013, 11:15 AM
CUOPS: Good morning, sir. One of your CCIRs was tripped this morning, when a division Soldier was arrested for multiple counts of crimes against nature involving bestiality, disseminating obscene materials and conspiracy.
CUOPS: Sir, the Soldier and his wife were apparently engaging in sex acts with dogs, filming them and posting the videos on the Internet.
CG: (Stunned silence)
Unidentified: Ruh Roh!
All: (Stifled laughter)
CG: Are you guys putting me on?
CUOPS: No, sir. Here is a copy of the police report.
Unidentified: What's that, Lassie? Timmy did obscene things to you and posted them on the internet?
All: (Stifled laughter)
CG: Knock it off! This isn't funny.
CUOPS: No, Sir.
CG: Okay, I get it, but this is still serious. PAO, have you had any media inquiries?
PAO: Yes, Sir. We've been getting dogged all morning.
PAO: What? ...oh. Sir, I didn't mean...
CG: I know. Keep going.
PAO: Several media outlets have requested comments. There were a number of questions as to how we became aware of the incident...
Unidentified: They'd have gotten away with it if it weren't for those kids and their dog.
CG: This is serious. Some troopie screws the pooch... Uh, I mean...
All: (Hysterical laughter)
09-19-2013, 01:57 PMBail was set at $15,000 each.The difference between pigs and people is that when they tell you you're cured it isn't a good thing.
09-19-2013, 02:00 PM
Officers took two mixed breed dogs and three cats from the home and placed them at a local shelter.
This get's confusing, were they the family dogs they were having sex with or porn star dogs? If they were family dogs would that be an added charge of incest?The difference between pigs and people is that when they tell you you're cured it isn't a good thing.
09-19-2013, 02:04 PM
I wonder if the sequester forced them to hire non-human porn stars to save money and if this is so would this be the Republicans fault? They were military, it's hard to do a quality porn flick when your raises have been stopped.
09-19-2013, 02:28 PM
- Join Date
- Nov 2010
- Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic of Michiganistanovia
Maybe they just have really ugly friends?
09-19-2013, 03:07 PM
I would make a case that the dogs were dependents of the couple, and that this is a case of sexual abuse. You can get 20+ years for that, when for something like plain old consensual incest wouldn't draw that many years.
These freaks will likely never be able to get animals from a shelter again, but there are always fools who will sell a puppy or kitty to anyone, plus, free cats are wherever there are strays. Give them 25 years for the sake of the animals.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|