Originally Posted by Elspeth
To GLBT activists, any religious person who questions whether homosexual parenting is good for children is a "bigot". Hyperbolic language is not a substitute for facts or evidence.
And, once again, the strategy is ad homimem attack, not a look at the evidence itself.
Being religious and being a professional bigot for pseudo-christian political groups are not the same thing?
I've been seeing mention of this all afternoon.
Is someone actually surprised that the NYT endorsed Clinton? Really? This is arguably the least news-worthy "news" that I have seen in years.
Good on you. That's brilliant!
I was most disheartened to hear that some Titans did this as well, at least for the first regular season game (not sure if it's happened since).
Back when the...
What do you do when a state refuses to let go of Coring the Commoner?
‘UNFAIR ADVANTAGE’: Clinton Campaign Trying to Get Moderators to Fact-Check Trump...