Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11  
    Quote Originally Posted by DumbAss Tanker View Post
    Get real, there certainly are a small minority of violent sexual assaults perpetrated by women (Which was involved in exactly none of the infanticide cases you mentioned), but the vast majority of violent sexual assaults and molestation is committed by men.
    Not to mention Yates and Smith were killers. They weren't sexual predators. That's a different crime all together.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #12  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,654
    Quote Originally Posted by DumbAss Tanker View Post
    Get real, there certainly are a small minority of violent sexual assaults perpetrated by women (Which was involved in exactly none of the infanticide cases you mentioned), but the vast majority of violent sexual assaults and molestation is committed by men.
    The point I was making is that you can't point to one side and say how crazy they are when both sides to some crazy stuff. Men are more apt to commit sexual assault. This is why prison rape is so prevalent. But women are guilty of heinous things as well. They commit the vast majority of infanticide. In short, one side is not crazier than the other.
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #13  
    Sin City Moderator RobJohnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    17,748
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #14  
    Power CUer noonwitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Warren, MI
    Posts
    13,094
    Quote Originally Posted by RobJohnson View Post

    Funny.


    Feminists have been decrying modern medicine's willingness to put female patients on medications for decades-at least since the invention of Valium ("Mother's Little Helper").

    I have a friend who developed migraines while going through the change of life. Her elderly doctor put her on barbituates for them. My friend was addicted within a few months, because her headaches were a daily thing. The doctor gave her refills on a regular basis, and she was popping 5 or 6 of them at a time. This went on for a couple of years, until the doctor retired. A younger female doctor took over the practice, read my friend's records and refused to write her any more scrips, and gave her some sample packets, telling her "wean yourself off that stuff, or check into detox". She also sent her for allergy tests. My friend was allergic to soy, which means she was getting headaches from pretty much everything she ate.


    Incidentally, I advised her to get allergy tests when she first started taking the pills, but she and her doctor felt it was just a menapousal thing.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #15  
    Senior Member DumbAss Tanker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    3,019
    Quote Originally Posted by RobJohnson View Post
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #16  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pierce County
    Posts
    2,090
    Quote Originally Posted by RobJohnson View Post
    I just posted this on my facebook wall.........as a general warning to all that is.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #17  
    Power CUer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    10,807
    Ah, you've all let noonwitch get you off track. That's how a thread about a baby-porn consumer (yes, BABY porn) ended up being about other things.

    Getting us back on track:


    Pedophiles Are Not National News -- When They're Gay Rights Pioneers
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-gra...#ixzz2vPD4MzGG

    The PJ Tatler recently reported on the case of Larry Brinkin, for many years an “icon” on the Human Rights Commission in San Francisco: “A former high-ranking San Francisco government employee convicted of felony possession of child pornography will continue to receive his government pension because, according to city regulations, evidence of ‘moral turpitude’ is required to revoke a pension yet viewing violent kiddie porn does not qualify as moral turpitude." (Emphasis theirs.)

    Michael Chapman of CNSNews.com also noted shocking racist remarks in Brinkin’s e-mails about "nailing" black toddlers. The media that loves riffing on pedophile Catholic priests have done nothing on this pedophile story. But 25 years ago, Brinkin was hailed as a gay-rights hero for instituting the “domestic partnership” rules in San Francisco.

    Apparently, the liberals only publish the materials that fit their smug narrative of progressivism on the march, with no villains on the Left. A Nexis search shows that on July 5, 1989, The Washington Post published an almost 4,000-word Brinkin appreciation by reporter Cynthia Gorney, which began:

    "Sometime this month, as soon as the paperwork has been put in order and the county clerk's office says it's time, Larry Brinkin is going to change into something elegant and walk to San Francisco City Hall with the music professor whose role in Brinkin's life is about to be formally renamed...."

    Kiddie Porn Does Not Count as ‘Moral Turpitude’ to S.F. Govt.
    http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2014/01/23...inglepage=true

    A former high-ranking San Francisco government employee convicted of felony possession of child pornography will continue to receive his government pension because, according to city regulations, evidence of “moral turpitude” is required to revoke a pension yet viewing violent kiddie porn does not qualify as moral turpitude.

    As reported here in the Tatler, Larry Brinkin, a prominent San Francisco Human Rights Commissioner and nationally known gay rights advocate, was arrested in 2012 for possessing and possibly distributing videos and images of babies being raped by adult men. Because of Brinkin’s “iconic” stature in the community as the person who pioneered “domestic partnership” laws nationwide, supporters at the time accused the police of framing him with false charges. But the evidence was so overwhelming that, after 18 months of legal wrangling, on Tuesday, January 21, Brinkin pled guilty to felony possession of child pornography, with various other more serious charges dropped as part of the plea bargain. He will serve just six months in jail and thereafter have to register as a sex offender...

    Child porn and molestation scandal shocks SF, ruins Gay Pride public relations blitz
    http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2014/01/23...inglepage=true


    ...Police say that Brinkin had pornographic images, some that appear to show children as young as 1 and 2 or 3 years old being sodomized and performing oral sex on adult men, in e-mail attachments linked to his account, according to a search warrant served by San Francisco police.

    ...According to the search warrant, SFPD acted after receiving a tip from the Los Angeles Police Department, which obtained from AOL an e-mail exchange between a Los Angeles user and zack3737@aol.com. Police say they linked the AOL address to Brinkin’s IP address; he is owner of the account and paid for AOL service with his credit card.

    The warrant claims these e-mails contained images of children as young as perhaps a year old being sodomized by and performing oral sex on adult men. Zack3737@aol.com — whom the police allege is Brinkin — provided graphic commentary on the photos of interracial adult-child sex. Comments included “I loved especially the ****** 2 year old getting nailed. Hope you’ll continue so I can see what the little blond bitch is going to get. White Power! White Supremacy! White Dick Rules!”
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #18  
    Recycled Roadkill
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    80
    hang em high
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #19  
    Sin City Moderator RobJohnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    17,748
    Quote Originally Posted by noonwitch View Post
    Funny.


    Feminists have been decrying modern medicine's willingness to put female patients on medications for decades-at least since the invention of Valium ("Mother's Little Helper").

    I have a friend who developed migraines while going through the change of life. Her elderly doctor put her on barbituates for them. My friend was addicted within a few months, because her headaches were a daily thing. The doctor gave her refills on a regular basis, and she was popping 5 or 6 of them at a time. This went on for a couple of years, until the doctor retired. A younger female doctor took over the practice, read my friend's records and refused to write her any more scrips, and gave her some sample packets, telling her "wean yourself off that stuff, or check into detox". She also sent her for allergy tests. My friend was allergic to soy, which means she was getting headaches from pretty much everything she ate.


    Incidentally, I advised her to get allergy tests when she first started taking the pills, but she and her doctor felt it was just a menapousal thing.
    Finally there seems to be a trend that doctors are starting to be more careful. I think in the past it was just easier to write a script and send a patient out the door then to deal with the real issues or look for the cause. Electronic recording keeping has helped as well. Some patients would have two or three similar prescriptions written by doctors in the same building and the doctors had no clue they were being shopped, or would they take the time to check.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #20  
    Sin City Moderator RobJohnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    17,748
    Quote Originally Posted by MountainMan View Post
    I just posted this on my facebook wall.........as a general warning to all that is.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •