Thread: More on the Berg v. Obama lawsuit

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1 More on the Berg v. Obama lawsuit 
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Obama Birth Certificat must be shown Oct 15th

    This is the court document! Judge Surrick ruled against Obama and the DNC. Obama has till October 15th to produce his legal documents by order of the court!

    http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal.../281573/18/0.p... ------ Your link provided a follow on link to the "BERG v. OBAMA et al" Docket Report.

    People who want to follow the docket proceeding can click on the filing numbers in the report. Docket Report http://news.justia.com/cases/feature...v04083/281573/ Filing #15

    (linked from the docket report) October 6, 2008 DNC joins Obama and Judge Surrick grants protective order.

    http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal...083/281573/15/ Filing #16 (linked from the docket report) October 7, 2008 Forensic evidence submitted to...
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    no-man's land in Texas
    Posts
    2,168
    Beware the ides of october, Messiah! :D
     

  3. #3  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Quote Originally Posted by Teetop View Post
    Beware the ides of october, Messiah! :D
    SlipSliding Away Is a way of life with these critters !
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member LibraryLady's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Louisiana
    Posts
    3,748
    These are not signed. Just a prototype, sorry.
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,421
    The first link is no good. Do you have another?
     

  6. #6  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Quote Originally Posted by Phillygirl View Post
    The first link is no good. Do you have another?
    try this one !

    http://www.newswithviews.com/Ryter/jon252.htm

    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin...gi?read=132921
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,421
    Okay, apparently the Order has not been signed.
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,421
    I fixed the title as the Order has not been signed by Judge Surrick
     

  9. #9  
    Patent Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    1,784
    http://www.americasright.com/2008/10...october-9.html

    The plaintiff filed proposed orders for the Judge to sign. Nothing unusual.
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •