Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18
  1. #1 Obama Considering Executive Action On Contraception Mandate After Hobby Lobby Ruling 
    Power CUer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    10,234
    Thou shalt not challenge any aspect of Obamacare.

    Obama weighs executive hammer
    http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbyi...ecutive-hammer

    President Obama is weighing executive actions after the Supreme Court ruled against ObamaCare’s contraception mandate.

    The White House swiftly called on Congress to enact a legislative fix but realistically knows lawmakers aren’t about to act.

    Obama has come under criticism from Republicans for his use of executive actions. Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) has announced the House will vote this month on approving a lawsuit against Obama over actions Boehner says are an abuse of power.

    But the GOP criticism and threat seem unlikely to act as a brake on Obama, who separately on Monday said he would move forward with administrative actions on immigration reform in the face of what he described as GOP obstructionism.

    “As we assess the impact of this decision, we'll consider whether or not there is a range of other options that may be available that don't require legislative action,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters.

    Democrats signaled in the hours after the high court’s decision that they think the issue could boost their turnout in the fall by highlighting GOP opposition to abortion rights. That makes it even more likely that Obama will not fear taking executive steps.

    And beyond that, the Supreme Court’s justices appeared to be offering their blessing for a regulatory fix.

    In a 5-4 decision in the case generally known as Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby, the court ruled that closely held companies — those that are owned and controlled by a very small number of people — are covered by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which guarantees that, “government shall not substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion.”

    The birth control mandate violated that law and does not apply to those closely held firms that harbor a religious objection, the court found.

    Both the majority opinion, drafted by Justice Samuel Alito, and a concurring opinion, penned by Justice Anthony Kennedy, suggest that an accommodation already offered to some religious nonprofits could be extended to closely held firms.

    The arrangement allows a third party or “middleman” such as an insurance company to cover the contraception coverage, at no expense to the employer, for female employees seeking it.

    “That accommodation equally furthers the government’s interest but does not impinge on the plaintiffs’ religious beliefs,” Kennedy wrote.

    The accommodation itself is the subject of a separate legal fight that some view as destined for the Supreme Court. In that case, the Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, a Colorado-based order of nuns, argues that the accommodation is unconstitutional.

    Still, extending the accommodation to include closely held businesses appears to be the path of least resistance for the administration...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Power CUer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    11,464
    Alito's decision basically invited the government (HHS) to provide the missing coverage by regulation; Obama took him up on it pretty quickly.
    "Today, [the American voter] chooses his rulers as he buys bootleg whiskey, never knowing precisely what he is getting, only certain that it is not what it pretends to be." - H.L. Mencken
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    I'm so sick of Obama throwing his executive you know what around.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Sin City Moderator RobJohnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    17,425
    The few companies that qualify and do not want to pay for the contraceptives will be getting a break and the taxpayers will be picking up the tab.

    Hobby Lobby won't be one of them as their insurance plans have always covered the "pill" prior to the ACA and will continue to do so after the ACA with zero co-pay.

    As for Plan B, no one ever gets a prescription for that in the first place. It's available OTC.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Dlr Pyro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    So. Cal
    Posts
    563
    If this is true then obama clearly has no respect for the separation of powers as set forth in the Constitution and needs to be impeached.

    Let the race baiters wail and the hood rats riot, but this fucker has to go.
    The price of freedom is something the protected will never know.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Lanie View Post
    I'm so sick of Obama throwing his executive you know what around.
    What is he supposed to do when he has a congress that wont work with him? besides, Bush signed far more executive orders than Obama ever has.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    673
    Quote Originally Posted by Real American View Post
    What is he supposed to do when he has a congress that wont work with him? besides, Bush signed far more executive orders than Obama ever has.
    What is congress supposed to do when we have a non-American, communist, Muslim in the white house that thinks he's king?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Dlr Pyro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    So. Cal
    Posts
    563
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyJeb View Post
    What is congress supposed to do when we have a non-American, communist, Muslim in the white house that thinks he's king?

    Impeach.
    The price of freedom is something the protected will never know.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Sin City Moderator RobJohnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    17,425
    Quote Originally Posted by Real American View Post
    Bush signed far more executive orders than Obama ever has.
    So have many other Presidents. I think it's the type of orders that are upsetting people.

    Executive Orders: Richard Nixon 346, Ronald Reagan 381, George W. Bush 291, Obama 180.

    Several of GWB's had to due with the war. Such as this one:

    http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archiv...0020703-1.html
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Power CUer NJCardFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    16,305
    Quote Originally Posted by Real American View Post
    What is he supposed to do when he has a congress that wont work with him? besides, Bush signed far more executive orders than Obama ever has.
    Hey fuckbag, Bush isn't president anymore.
    The Obama Administration: Deny. Deflect. Blame.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •