the liberal's viewpoint on California Prop 8.
I understand the why they oppose Prop 8 in and of itself; it is the position that they are taking on the ammending a State Constitution that baffles me.
I thought that liberals wanted a living breathing constitution that could be easily ammended and open for interpretation even when not ammended.
Now they are screaming the California Constitution can not and should not be ammended by the People. They had (have) activist judges rule in their favor according to (their belief) the Caifornia Constitution. The reaction was an initiative to change the Constitution. The People have spoken, the Constitution should be ammended.
Aren't constitutional ammendments and a "living document" staples of the left?
I am confused. Please help.