Why? They are making plenty of money NOT serving gays and lesbians and I am sure a good chunk of those who do use it used it because it DID NOT cater to gays and lesbians. It was the CEO's business model and he has (or should have) the right to do business with whoever he wants.
I used to own a gas station and I can tell you right now that I would not have hired an openly gay applicant to work for me and the reason for it (though not on paper) would have been because he was gay. If he had been qualified in every other way, being gay would have disqualified him. It would have been that reason alone why he could not work for me.
no they would have instead have had to have paid MILLIONS in legal fees over a span of years.And the 50k was part of the settlement if I understand that right... It doesnt seem like its something they would have to pay if they had gone to court and won.
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|