Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1 Explain why Democrats in Congress keep saying it's "too soon" to be discussing impeac 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    4,179
    link

    Nevermypresident (88 posts)

    Explain why Democrats in Congress keep saying it's "too soon" to be discussing impeachment?!!!

    -Obstruction of Justice (evidence in public, FFS)

    -Potential Abuse of Power ( traitor giving top secret intel to Russians in Oval Office - jeopardizing National Security and our ally(s)) Also, now public.

    What's the strategy? IMO, at this point we look weak by not calling a spade a spade. Hell I'm aware the rethugs won't do it but the Dems in Congress need to not confuse the citizens by saying it's too soon. It gives the appearance that our traitor isn't guilty of impeachable offenses.

    How long can this runaway train (leaks, thank God) keep going? Seriously, are we to wait another year(s) for Special Counsel to wrap this up in a bow? The impeachable evidence is public. Show Americans that the rethugs, once again, are aiding and abetting an enemy of the U.S. when they don't vote for impeachment in the House.

    Mueller, FBI, and congressional committees can continue investigations into Russian cyberops, money/financial crimes, etc. Then they can actually indict traitor tiny hands once he's impeached as long as the statue of limitations hasn't expired.

    If you feel as I do, call your Dems in Congress. I am.
    LOL. They're saying it's "too soon" because they KNOW there is nothing to impeach him on. Those that say there is are basing it on innuendo, outright lies and the fallacy that simply having contact with Russians is "proof" of collusion.

    And they know that despite all of the efforts to push Trump supporters and Republicans to turn on Trump they are not stupid and see if for what it is and do not agree with impeachment. If they try it voters will turn on the Democrats. So they've changed their tune and are saying it's "too soon". Democrats still say that there is no evidence of collusion - not that DUers will believe it.
    BainsBane (41,545 posts)

    1. Everyone of them could say exactly what you wanted

    and it would make zero difference. They don't control the House. I expect they are being measured in their comments so as not to undermine credibility for what is inevitably coming.
    Nevermypresident (88 posts)

    8. I know it would make zero difference. My point was our Dems saying it's too soon when the American

    public has clearly seen the evidence of Obstruction of Justice, undermines the gravity of trump's actions.

    Why can't their message be the truth...that they are powerless because the rethugs will not do the right thing for our country?!
    American public = Democrats, Republican's/conservative's saying there is no evidence = irrelavent.

    flor-de-jasmim (797 posts)

    4. Think back to Nixon /Agnew. Get rid of Pence and Ryan, then impeach.
    gibraltar72 (315 posts)

    5. They want

    to let Republicans simmer in Trump sauce till they are well done.
    Me. (14,618 posts)

    6. T's Crossed, I's Dotted, Charges Filed

    No jumping of gun
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Festivus Moderator ralph wiggum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Springfield, USA
    Posts
    19,276
    Lack of any proof?
    Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member SVPete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    5,809
    Simple. Cooking fruitcake takes time.
    I support UNexit: Get the US out of the UN; Get the UN out of the US!

    BIG CHEETO Is Watching You!

    Those who can, do.
    Those who know, teach.
    Ignorant incapables, regulate.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •