Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 63
  1. #1 Maybe Obama won't be as bad as we thought 
    Senior Member jeskibuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    438
    We have to wonder if Obama meant what he's said before or just said it to sucker in the dimwit vote.

    I just watched today's "Meet The Press" where his interview comprised most of the show. A lot of things he said may cause some eyebrows to be raised among his supporters. He appears to be backpedalling on many of his former stances. Some of the things he said concerning Iraq indicate that he won't be pulling the Dumbocrat surrender that so many had hoped for. Some of the other things he said about the economy may indicate that we're not headed for the socialistic doomsday we had anticipated.

    It all depends on what mark Obama wants to make during his Presidency. If he intends to blindly apply the fantasy ideologies he has so far espoused, we're screwed royally. If he intends to really help the nation, perhaps he'll listen to wise words from advisers and NOT do the things that he promised to do. The problem is, will the cesspool of dimwitted idiots he's surrounded himself provide ANY wise words?

    Either way, the Dimwits will get the raw end of the deal. If Obama does as he promised to do, we're all in for economic and security woes and the Dimwits will suffer along with the rest of us. If Obama breaks his promises, the Dimwits won't get what they thought they bargained for. Of course, they'll probably ignore every calamity and scandal, praising Obama for the wonderous miracles he has performed. We saw that with Clinton.

    Maybe he'll get a reality check once he gets all the information a President is privy to. We can only hope.
    Nothing says "idiot inside" better than an Obama/Biden bumper sticker.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    Quote Originally Posted by jeskibuff View Post
    We have to wonder if Obama meant what he's said before or just said it to sucker in the dimwit vote.

    I just watched today's "Meet The Press" where his interview comprised most of the show. A lot of things he said may cause some eyebrows to be raised among his supporters. He appears to be backpedalling on many of his former stances. Some of the things he said concerning Iraq indicate that he won't be pulling the Dumbocrat surrender that so many had hoped for. Some of the other things he said about the economy may indicate that we're not headed for the socialistic doomsday we had anticipated.

    It all depends on what mark Obama wants to make during his Presidency. If he intends to blindly apply the fantasy ideologies he has so far espoused, we're screwed royally. If he intends to really help the nation, perhaps he'll listen to wise words from advisers and NOT do the things that he promised to do. The problem is, will the cesspool of dimwitted idiots he's surrounded himself provide ANY wise words?

    Either way, the Dimwits will get the raw end of the deal. If Obama does as he promised to do, we're all in for economic and security woes and the Dimwits will suffer along with the rest of us. If Obama breaks his promises, the Dimwits won't get what they thought they bargained for. Of course, they'll probably ignore every calamity and scandal, praising Obama for the wonderous miracles he has performed. We saw that with Clinton.

    Maybe he'll get a reality check once he gets all the information a President is privy to. We can only hope.
    Don't count on it !He's just getting up to speed on reality but once he has time to spin off a few of his bull Sh*t promises and sooth some bent egos he will burst into full Socialism and hand the country over o the UN to rape and rob .Old BarnyFag wants to cut the defence budget by at least a quarter and BMD will be the first to feel the cuts.Queers in the military, Global Warming along with Keyoto redoux !
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sonora, Texas
    Posts
    4,117
    He can't go with the moonbats on everything. He is (or should be) smart enough to know that there will not any Bush to run against in 2012. Alot of his votes were more votes against Bush than out of loyalty to him. He has to hang on to these voters and they will bail on him the minute they can vote for someone else. The moonbats will vote for him no matter what he does, no matter how far to the center they may go. He has to hold on to the middle and to do so he has to move to the middle.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sonora, Texas
    Posts
    4,117
    As far as the Fags in Uniform, I hope that enough Sausage Smokers and Carpet Munchers want to enlist to make up for the ones that will leave the service in disgust. We have seen how disciplined these people are on the Proposition 8 crap.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member jeskibuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    438
    Quote Originally Posted by megimoo View Post
    he will burst into full Socialism
    One of the things he said was that "government has a pretty poor record of running businesses", a good indication to me that he understands that government control of industries like auto manufacturing is destined for failure

    Quote Originally Posted by megimoo View Post
    ...and hand the country over o the UN to rape and rob
    Yeah, all it takes is one stupid naive screwup like that to really hose things up


    Quote Originally Posted by megimoo View Post
    ...Global Warming along with Keyoto redoux !
    Well, if you're really good at changing light bulbs, Obama has got a job for YOU! That's a keystone of his brilliant economic plan. He wants to put people to work changing millions of light bulbs in office buildings across the nation! It will be good for short term employment he says, and long term energy use. So yeah, this stupid plan cancels out what he said about government interference in businesses, not to mention the sudden introduction of millions of unspent incandescent light bulbs in our landfills. Maybe there'll be some "enlightenment" for him on this plan before he implements it.
    Nothing says "idiot inside" better than an Obama/Biden bumper sticker.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member jeskibuff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    438
    Quote Originally Posted by Speedy View Post
    As far as the Fags in Uniform, I hope that enough Sausage Smokers and Carpet Munchers want to enlist to make up for the ones that will leave the service in disgust.
    That'll solve 2 problems at once by helping the dismal enlistment figures and by eliminating really stupid people from this planet. The bad news is that they'd provide absolutely no value in a fight against terrorists and would probably only encourage terrorists to get into little challenges: "Ahmed, I took out 42 limp-wristed American soldiers during lunch today. Can you beat THAT?"
    Nothing says "idiot inside" better than an Obama/Biden bumper sticker.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Senior Member marinejcksn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Penn State
    Posts
    1,820
    Quote Originally Posted by Speedy View Post
    As far as the Fags in Uniform, I hope that enough Sausage Smokers and Carpet Munchers want to enlist to make up for the ones that will leave the service in disgust. We have seen how disciplined these people are on the Proposition 8 crap.
    Honestly I could care less if gays serve. I just don't think they need to change Don't Ask / Don't Tell. I know there are gay Marines, I've known some of them. What people do behind closed doors is nobody's business. Goldwater said "you don't need to be straight to serve, you just have to shoot straight".
    Last edited by marinejcksn; 12-07-2008 at 12:39 PM.
    "Don't vote. It only encourages the bastards." -PJ O'Roarke
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,421
    Quote Originally Posted by marinejcksn View Post
    Honestly I could care less if gays serve. I just don't think they need to change Don't Ask / Don't Tell. I know there are gay Marines, I've known some of them. What people do behind closed doors is nobody's business.
    I see that attitude a lot among the younger members of the military. It seems to me that the most objection to gays serving (and this is merely anecdotal, so take it for what it's worth) comes from the older generation, and particularly those that are no longer serving.

    Can you tell me why you don't think DADT shouldn't be changed, if you have no objection to them serving in general? What changes do you see happening if gays were permitted to serve openly?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Sonora, Texas
    Posts
    4,117
    They don't need to change the don't ask/don't tell policy. Doing so and allowing openly gay men and women into the service will be disruptive. Just like with the whole gay marriage issue, many openly gay people will enlist to make a statement, not because they have a sincere desire to serve. And then there is our enemy, who already hates us and now along with being infidels we will be sodomites. Oh big yay!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,421
    Quote Originally Posted by Speedy View Post
    They don't need to change the don't ask/don't tell policy. Doing so and allowing openly gay men and women into the service will be disruptive. Just like with the whole gay marriage issue, many openly gay people will enlist to make a statement, not because they have a sincere desire to serve. And then there is our enemy, who already hates us and now along with being infidels we will be sodomites. Oh big yay!
    So we should base our security requirements on what our enemy thinks of us? That is the least compelling reason I can think of to keep DADT.

    The disruption aspect I can understand, as I don't think the military should be used as social experimentation. But I imagine that having men and women serve side by side has caused its own disruptions. I'm not convinced that having gays serve also will be any more disruptive than the co-ed military we currently have. What additional disruptions do you think there will be as a result of eliminating DADT?

    And while I'm sure there will be at least a few who sign up to make a statement, I am equally certain that the novelty of that will wear off and we will have the best of the best, who serve for the reasons that the heterosexuals serve.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •