So why is it that I should believe you and you-tube over Aldrin and NASA?
Btw, another great video In the Shadow of the Moon (2007) is great!
|
|
So why is it that I should believe you and you-tube over Aldrin and NASA?
Btw, another great video In the Shadow of the Moon (2007) is great!
Judging from your replies nobody has examined the evidence I posted in post #1. The evidence shows the moon missions were faked. If you think it doesn't, say why.So why is it that I should believe you and you-tube over Aldrin and NASA?
Hoax-believers have made a few mistakes. A lot of them are well-known and some of them are in those videos I posted. When those mistakes are corrected, they don't prove the missions were real.
Here's an example.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wym04J_3Ls0
3W's (dot) youtube (dot) com/watch?v=Wym04J_3Ls0
Mythbusters is correct. This was a mistake made by hoax-believers. However, when this mistake is corrected, there's still the issue of whether this was taken in a studio or not. It doesn't disprove the hoax theory. There is other irrefutable evidence of a hoax.
This is from post #1.
Watch how the corner of Collins' jacket moves in this clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_CMgqitv98
3W's (dot) youtube (dot) com/watch?v=I_CMgqitv98
(50 second mark)
It swings back and forth the way it would in gravity.
Look at the corners of the jacket the woman astronaut is wearing in this clip.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TejsnPThmd4
uk (dot) youtube (dot) com/watch?v=TejsnPThmd4
This is real zero-gravity and they behave quite differently.
One possible explanation is that they were trying to fake zero-gravity in a diving plane and the plane wasn't diving fast enough at that point.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1UEv2PIzl4
3W's (dot) youtube (dot) com/watch?v=n1UEv2PIzl4
At the 2 minute 35 second mark of the video the flag is still. When the astronaut goes past it, it starts to move.
Last edited by Cosmored; 12-27-2008 at 11:59 AM.
The landing vehicles left on the Moon can be seen with a telescope.
Case closed.
You're batshit insane.Those pictures were taken in a studio and Aldrin is lying.
Last edited by Sonnabend; 12-14-2008 at 07:30 AM.
I've never seen a picture. Please post one. As I said before--pictures can be faked so they are not proof of anything.The landing vehicles left on the Moon can be seen with a telescope.
Case closed.
Quote:
Those pictures were taken in a studio and Aldrin is lying.
You're batshit insane.
You're ignoring the hoax evidence I posted. You people seem to be in denial.
http://www.learningandteaching.info/...dissonance.htm
(excerpt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cognitive dissonance is a psychological phenomenon which refers to the discomfort felt at a discrepancy between what you already know or believe, and new information or interpretation. It therefore occurs when there is a need to accommodate new ideas, and it may be necessary for it to develop so that we become "open" to them. Neighbour (1992) makes the generation of appropriate dissonance into a major feature of tutorial (and other) teaching: he shows how to drive this kind of intellectual wedge between learners' current beliefs and "reality".
Beyond this benign if uncomfortable aspect, however, dissonance can go "over the top", leading to two interesting side-effects for learning:
if someone is called upon to learn something which contradicts what they already think they know — particularly if they are committed to that prior knowledge — they are likely to resist the new learning. Even Carl Rogers recognised this. Accommodation is more difficult than Assimilation, in Piaget's terms.
and—counter-intuitively, perhaps—if learning something has been difficult, uncomfortable, or even humiliating enough, people are less likely to concede that the content of what has been learned is useless, pointless or valueless. To do so would be to admit that one has been "had", or "conned".
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I said they can be seen from a telescope. Go to an observatory and ask to see it. The vehicles are visible..so that, as they say, is that.I've never seen a picture. Please post one. As I said before--pictures can be faked so they are not proof of anything.
There is no "evidence", and there have been multiple missions to the Moon. Were they faked too?You're ignoring the hoax evidence I posted. You people seem to be in denial.
![]()
Last edited by Sonnabend; 12-14-2008 at 09:07 AM.
Wait for it...
You discount the use of pictures that will prove you are wrong, and yet you cling to pictures and video to make your case. How do you know the pictures you're relying on haven't been faked?
You also didn't answer my question from upthread; if the moon landings were a fake, why do it more than once? One time would have satisfied our goals and the promise JFK made to the country, so why risk exposure by going through the same fakery 9 times?
Uh...Linda....TMI, m,'lady.And no competent woman would have spilled any on the dress to begin with.
WAY TMI
(P.s Merry Christmas :))
For the sane amongst us, a memory of one of Man's greatest moments
![]()
| « Previous Thread | Next Thread » |