I think that sums it up enough. But incase you still want to be ignorant, here are counter arguments to every conspiracy theory about the moon landings.The landing vehicles left on the Moon can be seen with a telescope.
Here are quotes from another site.
"If in fact we did go to the Moon, as NASA contends, then the evidence that we did go to the Moon should stand up to scrutiny. That evidence has been in the public domain for 30 years now in the form of photographs, images of spacecraft taken by astronauts in other spacecraft as well as images of the spacecraft heading towards the moon by telescope from the Earth, video records broadcast in real-time and seen in real-time, scientific experiments placed on the moon (whose placement was clearly documented by the lunar photography including still photography by the astronauts and video images transmitted in real-time), moonrocks and samples returned from the surface of the moon which support the supposition that they resided on the Moon (by examining the chemical makeup of the rocks, isotopic abundances, cosmic ray exposure ages, radioactive dating techniques, etc.), and by the astronauts themselves both in situ on the lunar surface and after their return to Earth.
The TMLWF crowd usually falls back on the typical large and complex, self sustaining conspiracy theory arguments, including the grand notion that they were faked by elaborate Hollywood style film fakery on some secret sound stage. Lets stop to ponder this for a moment. Think of the best special effects movies that you have ever seen. Now think of the inconsistencies and visual errors that even the casual and uninformed audience can see in these films. Now think back to 1969 and the movies that were made then. Could we have produced such fakery that it would not only stand up to the scrutiny of a 1969 audience, but also a whole generation of scientists familiar with the geologic study of celestial bodies? In fact, the only ones to find fault in this record is a small "cottage industry" group of TMLWFers."
This page disproves everything.
Have a field day!
And like a cockroach does when you shine the light on them, Cosmored has run for cover, refusing to face the light of truth.
TIME FOR MY OWN CONSPIRACY THEORY!!
Cosmored is really jeskibuff!
Why? Cosmored joined on Dec. 12. He posted two topics, American Imperialism and this on on Dec. 13. He has not been active since Dec. 14. Now, all of a sudden jeskibuff is telling me to look at all of his links. He never posted on this topic before! ZOMG!
Do you see this! Also, why did he put cosmored mode? Did he forget who he was? The only way this can be false is if you can give me pictures proving that I am wrong. But pictures can be changed and altered so they are not reliable.Now, please click on all my linkys again until you believe like I do. You won't be enlightened like me until you do that![/cosmored mode]
This picture proves my point. Nothing else is necessary. I will not tell you why this proves that jeskibuff is Cosmored, only that it is proof.
Last edited by Mythic; 12-16-2008 at 04:39 PM.
My cover is blown!
As an aside, here's a little Christmas tune to go along with that Hillary picture:
|« Previous Thread | Next Thread »|