Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1 When do Feminists NOT like Title IX? When the accused is FEMALE and a FEMINIST 
    Power CUer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    ‘Blaming the victim is apparently OK’: Feminist scholars denounce Title IX probe of female feminist professor

    All of a sudden, feminist professors are very concerned about due process in Title IX hearings!

    That’s because feminist literary theorist Avital Ronell, a philosophy professor at New York University, is reportedly under investigation by the school’s Title IX office. Exactly what she is accused of has not been detailed in news reports in which Ronell and NYU have also declined comment.

    But clearly, it’s a witch hunt, according to dozens of peers who recently signed a letter in Ronell’s defense, including one of the most well-known feminist theorists in the nation, Judith Butler.

    Admitting they have not read the case file, these scholars nevertheless denounce and decry the fact that the investigation is even underway, and accuse the unnamed accuser of waging a “malicious campaign,” according to the letter, obtained and published by University of Chicago law and philosophy Professor Brian Leiter on his blog.

    The hypocrisy (think hundreds, if not thousands, of young men who have been railroaded by Title IX probes over the last seven years) has not been lost on many observers, including Leiter, who titled his post: “Blaming the victim is apparently OK when the accused in a Title IX proceeding is a feminist literary theorist.”

    Writes Leiter: “[Y]ou get a real sense of the hypocrisy and entitlement of these precious ‘theorists’ in the concluding paragraph of the letter addressed to the NYU President and Provost: ‘We testify to the grace, the keen wit, and the intellectual commitment of Professor Ronell and ask that she be accorded the dignity rightly deserved by someone of her international standing and reputation. If she were to be terminated or relieved of her duties, the injustice would be widely recognized and opposed.'”

    “So while Professor Ronell ‘deserves a fair hearing,'” Leiter continued, “…other ‘lesser’ accused can be subject, without international outcry, to whatever star chamber proceedings the university wants. Moreover, only one outcome of the process is acceptable, regardless of the findings: acquittal. Any other result ‘would be widely recognized and opposed,’ I guess because grace, wit and intellectual commitment are a defense against sexual misconduct and harassment.”

    The situation also caught the eye of Christina Hoff Sommers, who has been tweeting about the situation for several days:
    Get the letter these rank hypocrites sent here:
    Reply With Quote  

  2. #2  
    Power CUer FlaGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    The Swamps of N. Florida
    Due Process for me but not for thee.
    Cast your burden on the Lord,
    and he will sustain you;
    he will never permit
    the righteous to be moved.
    Psalm 55:22
    Reply With Quote  

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts