The Chinese faked their spacewalk

[Rebel Yell]

Looney Toons are the best way to represent all our trolls.





Cosmonut



Meet.......



Blinky

[asdf2231]

If anyone wants to do some serious investigation into 9/11, there's a lot of good stuff in the 9/11 threads of these three forums. The first two are the old ones which are read-only. The last one is active.
.
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...orum/index.php
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...orum/index.php
http://s1.zetaboards.com/LooseChangeForums/index/

Okay... you just hit Fuck Off And Die territory you glass licking mongoloid homunculus.

[Mythic]

Cosmored! I want to help you! I feel bad that you are making yourself look like an idiot! There is a smart person in (almost) anyone!

Ok first off time to debunk your "explosion" theory.

Could transformers or other electrical equipment explain some of what the firemen saw and heard? What about an acre of concrete floor slamming into another? Would steel bolts snapping under tremendous tension make a pop or explosive sound? Assuming the towers weren't in the vacuum of space, I think that a loud banging noise could be something else. Don't go shout "BOMB!"

Also, if you want to see an electrical transformer catch on fire and blow up, watch this video.
http://www.stupidcollege.com/items/E...rmer-Explosion

I recommend this site.
http://www.debunking911.com/index.html
It debunks everything conspiracy about 9/11. Of course you wont visit it because you are biased and ignorant, and would like to remain so.

[Cosmored]

Ok first off time to debunk your "explosion" theory.

Simply providing another possible explanation doesn't constitute "Debunking". Now we have two plausible explanations for the noise--that's all.

I recommend this site.
http://www.debunking911.com/index.html
It debunks everything conspiracy about 9/11. Of course you wont visit it because you are biased and ignorant, and would like to remain so.

I scanned it but I haven't had time to look at everything. From what I saw though, this looks like a typical government damage-control site. They put forth other explanations for the evidence of an inside job and then just consider the evidence to be debunked. I didn't see any explanation for the picture of the nose of the craft that hit the Pentagon?http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/...gon1_plane.jpg

If there is one, could you post it?

If there are two plausible explanations for lots of the evidence and there is one piece of evidence that is impossible to explain, all of those plausible explanations put forward by the pro-government site fall by the wayside as they are not conclusive proof.

Choose something from that site you provided that you consider to be conclusive proof that 9/11 wasn't an inside job and we can talk about whether it's conclusive proof. I consider that picture of the nose of the plane that hit the Pentagon to be conclusive proof that 9/11 was an inside job.

[Cosmored]

They're addressing the faked Chinese space walk at the "Clavius" and "Bad Astronomy" forums.

http://apollohoax.proboards21.com/in...ay&thread=2206
http://www.bautforum.com/conspiracy-...broadcast.html

Click where it says "Web forum" in this site, and you'll get the first forum above.
http://www.clavius.org/

Both of those sites are government damage-control sites and all the regular posters on those sites know that the moon missions were faked. They seem to have been started because so many people are finding out that the Apollo moon missions were faked.

http://www.conservativeunderground.c...ead.php?t=9002

They're really having a hard time dealing with the evidence that the Chinese space walk was faked in a water tank. They aren't even discussing the evidence that it was faked. They are good at obfuscating evidence but some evidence is so clear that it can't be obfuscated. Those threads are laughable.

[newshutr]

Is this the same douche bag that was here a long time ago that claimed Aspbergers syndrome?

My Lord this person is a grade A this..

[Zathras]

Those threads are laughable.

Gee what a coincidence. So are yours.

[Sonnabend]

They're really having a hard time dealing with the evidence that the Chinese space walk was faked in a water tank.

We're having a hard time working out why the men with the butterfly nets haven't come to get you yet.

[enslaved1]

We're having a hard time working out why the men with the butterfly nets haven't come to get you yet.

They are posted outside the door, figuring as long as he stays in the basement, he's only hurting himself.

[FlaGator]

They're addressing the faked Chinese space walk at the "Clavius" and "Bad Astronomy" forums.

http://apollohoax.proboards21.com/in...ay&thread=2206
http://www.bautforum.com/conspiracy-...broadcast.html

Click where it says "Web forum" in this site, and you'll get the first forum above.
http://www.clavius.org/

Both of those sites are government damage-control sites and all the regular posters on those sites know that the moon missions were faked. They seem to have been started because so many people are finding out that the Apollo moon missions were faked.

http://www.conservativeunderground.c...ead.php?t=9002

They're really having a hard time dealing with the evidence that the Chinese space walk was faked in a water tank. They aren't even discussing the evidence that it was faked. They are good at obfuscating evidence but some evidence is so clear that it can't be obfuscated. Those threads are laughable.

Actually it's we're not having a hard time dealing with the evidence. A lot of us here just plain don't care.