Thread: No accountability? Then no more bailouts

Results 1 to 2 of 2

Hybrid View

  1. #1 No accountability? Then no more bailouts 
    An Adversary of Linda #'s
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,891
    "The only time these people respond is when their collective stupidity is pointed out to them and then they scramble to hide the evidence.They give our money away to their friends and contributors without any means of accounting just where it goes !"

    Through the blind generosity of Congress and the Bush administration, some of the nation's largest banks have been bestowed with billions of dollars from taxpayers. So is it too much to ask banks for an accounting of how such largesse is being used?
    Yes, says an Associated Press survey of 21 banks that received at least $1 billion in federal money.

    The AP reports that not a single bank would provide specific answers. What's worse is that they don't have to. There is no process to compel the banks to disclose how they're spending the money.

    A congressional oversight panel can't get the administration or Treasury Department officials to explain what it's doing or its strategy in giving out the nearly $350 billion released so far for the program.

    Granted, the $700 billion bailout is unprecedented. However, Congress and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who refused to accept any checks and balances in the hastily written legislation, promised taxpayers transparency and accountability.

    Paulson intended to buy risky loans from banks, freeing them to make better loans and pump cash into the economy. But after the funds were approved, Paulson announced that the money would instead be used to buy bank stock, hoping that banks, in turn, would issue loans and revise mortgages to help homeowners avoid foreclosures. That hasn't happened.

    Congress now wants to impose restrictions on the second half of the money, giving lenders financial incentives to do what it hoped they would do in the beginning. However, without vigilant rules and public bookkeeping, there's no way to know if the money is being used prudently and effectively.

    http://www.starbulletin.com/editoria..._bailouts.html
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    11,970
    Don't give them the other half. I have a sneaking suspicion that a great deal of this money that was given to these banks wound up overseas to bailout the bad loans in foreign countries. If they were using it for it's intended purpose, they would not have a disclosure problem.

    I hope the next Sec. of the Treasury is better than Paulson who came from Goldman S. and certainly enriched his banking friends. Congress should hold hearing and rake these top bankers over the coals. That will not happen because of Democraps like R. Rubin who should have been canned at CITI.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •