Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1 Virginia Gov. supports infanticide of babies born alive after failed abortions 
    Power CUer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    24,272
    Very fortunately, a bill supporting abortion during birth failed. At least for now.

    Virginia Gov. supports infanticide of babies born alive after failed abortions
    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vi...-failed-aborti
    ...Northam called the controversy “overblown.”

    He went on to explain what would happen in a situation of a woman wanting an abortion who was already in labor.

    "So in this particular example, if the mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen: The infant would be delivered; the infant would be kept comfortable; the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desire, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother,” he said.

    ...Shapiro called Northam's proposal "pure evil."

    "Northam is specifically talking about delivering an infant alive and then asking the mother whether the infant should live or not. This is not an argument about the morning-after pill. It’s not an argument over whether a fetus feels pain. This is a statement that a fully-formed infant, born alive, ought to be murdered if the mother says the infant ought to be murdered," he wrote.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Power CUer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    24,272
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Power CUer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    24,272
    Virginia Democrat squirms defending bill allowing abortion as woman is giving birth
    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/wa...ion-as-woman-i

    According to the bill’s summary, the proposed law:

    • Eliminates the requirement that an abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy and prior to the third trimester be performed in a hospital.
    • The bill eliminates all the procedures and processes, including the performance of an ultrasound, required to effect a woman's informed written consent to the performance of an abortion; however, the bill does not change the requirement that a woman's informed written consent be first obtained.
    • The bill eliminates the requirement that two other physicians certify that a third trimester abortion is necessary to prevent the woman's death or impairment of her mental or physical health, as well as the need to find that any such impairment to the woman's health would be substantial and irremediable.
    • The bill also removes language classifying facilities that perform five or more first-trimester abortions per month as hospitals for the purpose of complying with regulations establishing minimum standards for hospitals.


    When Delegate Gilbert pressed both Tran and a spokesperson for NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia for an example of the mental health conditions which might necessitate the late-term abortion of a baby, neither were able to come up with a single example...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Administrator SaintLouieWoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    44,602
    The plan did not pass the Virginia assembly. But it does reveal the true nature of the progressives. The video of NY's voting for virtually the same abortion "rights", with the cheering and men wearing pink ties, women with the pink accessories, almost partying that it passed in New York is beyond sickening. God alone can protect our country from the progressives. Well, it would help if voters woke up and would rise against this evil at the ballot box.
    http://http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r231/SarasotaRepub/83069bcc.png

    " To the world you are just one more person, but to a rescued pet, you are the world."

    "
    A Nation of Sheep Breeds a Government of Wolves!"

    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •