Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1 My friend is still upset from the last election debate where HRC let Trump stalk her 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    7,547
    link

    This again. The DUmp never changes. More evidence that the "truth" is what they want to believe rather than what actually happened.

    CTyankee (53,717 posts)

    My friend is still upset from the last election debate where HRC let Trump stalk her from

    behind as she was speaking. "She shudda turned around and said "WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE? SIT DOWN!"


    He's replaying all this stuff in his mind (a good Dem, he was a shop steward for his plumbers' union). I said I don't think ANY female Dem candidate would allow that now!
    Again for the lurkers. The W/Bitch left her side of the stage, walked across the stage in front of President Trump who was standing at his podium and who never moved once the bitch moved onto his side of the stage. Then she stood and flapped her gums. He wasn't even close to her. The camera angle only made it seem so. And if the bitch was uncomfortable why did she deliberately walk onto his side of the stage and why didn't she move if she was uncomfortable?

    I'll tell you why. The BITCH weaponized her vagina and then claimed to be a victim. It's one characteristic of a BITCH. If there was any "stalking" it was done by the bitch because she was the one who moved.

    And it's ONE reason white women did NOT vote for her.

    DUmmies? Well you know they believe what they want to believe and not truth.

    Bettie (6,306 posts)

    2. Frankly, the moderators should have shut

    that crap down.
    They should have. They should have told the bitch to go back to her side of the stage with her chair and her podium. But then it wasn't really an issue because she wasn't that close to him.

    gordianot (13,365 posts)

    4. She should have turned around and clocked him in the face.

    But that is hindsight. I seem to remember stories about Bill with a suspicious bruise.
    Right. She would have had to move at least 5 or 6 feet to do so and that would have ruined the 'he's standing right over me' AND it would have been pointed out that if she didn't like it she should have gone back to her side of the stage.

    marylandblue (11,089 posts)
    9. It didn't bother me at the time, but it seems it did hurt Clinton.

    No, I don't think any female candidate will let it go this time. Nor would they let go of that "nasty woman" comment.

    Especially not Warren, who I can see shifting into a feminist rant that drives the audience wild.
    It branded her as a bitch who was willing to lie and weaponize her vagina for political advantage.

    lunatica (42,097 posts)
    10. In an interview later Hillary said she was very aware of what he was doing

    As a woman Who is the same age as Hillary I can tell you that we learned decades ago not to show fear. She was ignoring him very deliberately. To acknowledge that she was in any way nervous would make him win. It is also political suicide to look weak or to appear to cower. Any politician, man or woman, would come across as being a coward. It was a choice she made, knowing that if she reacted to him she would come out the loser. And he would have used it to verbally attack her even more.

    I get it and would have done the same thing.
    Further proof that is what she was doing.

    CTyankee (53,717 posts)
    21. Not from a position of weakness but from strength. I think my friend was saying that she should

    have TOLD him in no uncertain terms that he had to go SIT DOWN!
    *shrug* Why? It was his side of the stage and his podium. She was the one who was where she wasn't supposed to be.

    demmiblue (20,769 posts)

    11. I'm still bothered by the fact that HE stalked HER.

    I thought that she handled the situation well.

    And I also would have cheered if she had confronted him.


    He stalked her? Just how did he force her to walk to his side of the stage?

    tanyev (28,721 posts)

    23. Or, "Donald, are you having trouble finding your chair? It's over there....there you go."

    One of the books I read recently mentioned that he planned in advance to do that because he thought it would look dominating. I thought it made him look like a crazy loon who couldn't find his slippers. But I blame the debate moderator. HRC had a lot running through her mind just then and if ‘Ignore it’ was her first instinct, I can’t fault her for that.
    He planned in advance to stay on his side of the stage, at his podium and ....somehow....."stalk her" by getting her to walk to his side of the stage and stand and flap her gums?

    LuvNewcastle (10,015 posts)

    26. I agree; it was the moderator's fault.

    He was 'moving on her like a bitch.' He's a predator, and the debate moderator has a responsibility to keep the debate from becoming physical.
    TreasonousBastard (31,926 posts)

    27. I remember that, and it still pisses me off. She made the decision at the time to ignore...

    him, and looking back it may not have been the right one. I wanted to knee the TV in the groin.

    But, that's history, and we are looking to next year. I agree-- can't imagine any of the women now running putting up with that. At the very least, practice debates would deal with it.

    If it's true that she threw books at her staff, can you imagine what Klobuchar might do to him? Warren? Harris, the prosecutor who looked murderers in the eye?

    We don't know if he would try that with any of the men, but imagine Mayor Pete slowly turning around and pointing to the other lectern.

    Part of me hopes he does try it again with whoever gets the nod. I vaguely remember one time back in '16 when someone called him on his bullshit and he ran off the stage. He is, after all, a coward.
    My guess is that if it happens again President Trump will tell whatever bitch it is to quit playing dirty pool and get back to his/her side of the stage and stay there.


    It's a long thread, over 60 comments. Liberals are divorced from reality and they think it's great. When you live in la la land you're never wrong, it's always the other person/groups fault and you can believe what you want to believe and call it 'truth'.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Festivus Moderator ralph wiggum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Springfield, USA
    Posts
    21,640
    Three words: get over it.
    Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member Dlr Pyro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    So. Cal
    Posts
    5,616
    Quote Originally Posted by ralph wiggum View Post
    Three words: get over it.
    Amen

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
    "Even if Trump didn't pay Russian hookers to pee on one another to defile a bed the Obamas once slept on it sounds like something he would do and that's all that matters." DemocratSinceBirth, Wed Jan 11, 2017, 09:32 AM

    "Enemy. The word you are looking for is enemy. When the ideals of someone are antithetical to yours, you can say the word "enemy". DUmmy ret5hd Fri Aug 24, 2018, 05:10 PM
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    445
    Hillary did that little snarky wiggle which showed voters she wasn’t serious at all about fixing the problems of the country. She was in it for her, and her alone.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Festivus Moderator ralph wiggum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Springfield, USA
    Posts
    21,640
    Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Dan D. Doty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pevely, Missouri
    Posts
    6,210
    Reminds me of the Covington Kids and Nick Sandmann.

    Even after these jerkazoids saw the whole video, they only believe the edited version,why? Because it added to narrative whole video and truth didn't.

    Duers can go back and look at that debate and see the truth, but they don't want that and they can't handle that.

    If it doesn't add to the narrative they either reject it , or create a fantasy to replace it.
    CU's Paranormal Expert.


    Keep your powder dry, your sword sharp and your wits intact.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    PORCUS STAPHUS ADMIN Rockntractor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    53,626
    I want to see her tossed in the Scooby van again like a sack of garden manure.
    "If the Bible is true why don't we have any urns or vessels that like say expires 6/15/300 BC on the bottom?"
    Alexandria Ocasio Cortez
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member Tecate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    1,656
    Quote Originally Posted by Rockntractor View Post
    I want to see her tossed in the Scooby van again like a sack of garden manure.
    You were a conspiracy theorist to claim that she was falling down flat on her face, even though it was caught on film multiple times.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Festivus Moderator ralph wiggum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Springfield, USA
    Posts
    21,640
    Quote Originally Posted by Tecate View Post
    You were a conspiracy theorist to claim that she was falling down flat on her face, even though it was caught on film multiple times.
    And sexist to boot!
    Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #10  
    eeeevil Sith Admin SarasotaRepub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    54,692
    One word...LOSER.

    May the FORCE be with you!
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •