Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1 ACLU Filed Motion To Block Trump Citizenship Question Executive Action 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    7,425
    link

    babylonsister (161,199 posts)

    ACLU Filed Motion To Block Trump Citizenship Question Executive Action

    https://www.politicususa.com/2019/07...-question.html



    Posted on Thu, Jul 11th, 2019 by Jason Easley
    ACLU Filed Motion To Block Trump Citizenship Question Executive Action
    Trump is trying to get around the Supreme Court with executive action on Census citizenship question, but the ACLU already filed a preemptive motion to block Trump.


    ACLU Voting Right Project Director Dale Ho told MSNBC, “We have a pending motion in the lawsuit we filed to permanently prevent the administration from adding a citizenship question based on their repeated representations that June 30th was the, quote, drop-dead date for changes to the census questionnaire. So that motion is going to be heard in federal court in about a week and a half. There’s pending proceedings in the federal court in Maryland about whether or not this attempt by the administration was motivated by a desire to weaken the political influence of Hispanic communities. Yes, I think if the administration does, in fact, come forward with a new decision, Trump adding a citizenship question you’ll see more action by the ACLU.”


    Trump executive action is an admission that he has no valid reason for including the citizenship question in the Census. The president is going to try an end around, but his executive order is going to result in more court cases and delay. The Census is being printed right now. It is possible if his executive action dragged out in court that the forms could already be mailed before the case is decided.

    The House has promised to block any funding for a Trump Census do-over, so Trump won’t have the funds to do another Census.

    This is a presidential tantrum that is going nowhere. Trump’s executive action is going to backfire on him and prevent the citizenship question from being included in the Census.
    Meanwhile the Jack*sses in congress on on DU are arguing about WHO they should nominate for the Presidency. WHO would be best?

    LOL. They should save their breath. If by some chance their bitch wins he/she will be nothing more than a figure head. Like the queen. Jack*sses think that they can refuse to allow President Trump to the things THAT ARE HIS PREROGATIVE as the President and then when their Jack*ss is the President that it is all going to change and he/she is going to be allowed to do ANYTHING he/she wants. They better nominate someone who doesn't fart because if they do they'll be sued for polluting.

    Jack*sses are drawing targets on their backs if the courts don't treat the JACK*SS President the same way they have treated President Trump.

    At the same time Democrats are showing how unhinged and hateful they are with this kind of crap.

    What they are also showing is that illegal immigrants are the new Democrat slaves. Just like they wanted the slaves to be counted as a whole person so that the DEMOCRATS would reap the power the numbers gave them in increased representation knowing THAT THEY WOULD DO NOTHING TO REPRESENT THE SLAVES, they now want the illegal immigrants counted in order to reap the power the increased representation would give them. And like the blacks they'll throw them subsistence welfare and place them on the Democrat slave Plantation.

    usaf-vet (844 posts)

    10. Is Roberts going to standby and let the likes of Trump minimize the status of the Supreme Court.

    I mean the historical status it has had in the molding of the laws we all are guided by.

    Is Roberts going to let Trump cast them aside as an insignificant interference in his tyrannical mission to destroy Democracy?

    Is Trump also going to destroy the federal Supreme Court like the republican governors have been doing in state Supreme Courts?

    Take Wisconsin's Supreme Court as an example. Bought and paid for by the likes of Koch brother money and their puppet Scotty Walker.

    The thought of a fair hearing in Wisconsin's Supreme Court is a pipe dream and a laughing matter.
    Jack*sses: Doing whatever they need to do to win even if it is threatening, bribing or extorting a Supreme Court Justice.
    Liberals are divorced from reality and they think it's great. When you live in la la land you're never wrong, it's always the other person/groups fault and you can believe what you want to believe and call it 'truth'.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Dan D. Doty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pevely, Missouri
    Posts
    6,149
    What they've been doing is telling the American people that they care more for the people sneaking into this country then those born here.

    Why?

    Because they want to replace the native born with a population that they think will keep them in power until the end of time.
    CU's Paranormal Expert.


    Keep your powder dry, your sword sharp and your wits intact.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Sunny South Fla.
    Posts
    1,049
    The dems are afraid of the real number of illegals in the US, it is most likely between 30 and 50 million.

    They want to keep the numbers from the public.
    I love the sound of liberal heads exploding in the morning!!

    Toxically masculine and proud of it!

    I will give up my guns when the liberals give up their illegal aliens.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member Tecate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    1,502
    Quote Originally Posted by Old n Grumpy View Post
    The dems are afraid of the real number of illegals in the US, it is most likely between 30 and 50 million.

    They want to keep the numbers from the public.
    Conspiracy theorists were saying 25-30 million a decade ago. No one knows the real numbers. I’m so happy they’re all here to cancel out my vote and to total my car with no fucking insurance. It’s so wonderful!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member Dlr Pyro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    So. Cal
    Posts
    5,509
    I look at it like this. If a distributor of soft drinks wants to take an inventory of his warehouse, he could just count to total cases of soda in the warehouse and have the total number of cases, or he could drill down and count how many cases of cola, diet cola, root beer, ginger ale, etc he has on hand so he has a more accurate count of what is residing in his warehouse and can make better business decisions off the more accurate imformation.

    Why take the count if you don't want to get the entire picture?

    I don't believe states should receive any assistance or representation based off people illegally in those states and that is why the legal status question is important.
    "Even if Trump didn't pay Russian hookers to pee on one another to defile a bed the Obamas once slept on it sounds like something he would do and that's all that matters." DemocratSinceBirth, Wed Jan 11, 2017, 09:32 AM

    "Enemy. The word you are looking for is enemy. When the ideals of someone are antithetical to yours, you can say the word "enemy". DUmmy ret5hd Fri Aug 24, 2018, 05:10 PM
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member cadillac shark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    4,575
    No problem. I just watched the press-conference that just ended. The President's going-around everybody and mining the data-bases of the Cabinet Departments.

    It'll be more accurate and cover about 95% of people living here.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    Power CUer FlaGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Swamps of N. Florida
    Posts
    27,392
    The SCOTUS didn't toss the question as being unconstitutional, the tossed the case on procedural grounds based on how the DOJ presented the case. An executive order would in no way usurp the power of the court.
    Cast your burden on the Lord,
    and he will sustain you;
    he will never permit
    the righteous to be moved.
    Psalm 55:22
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Senior Member hoplophobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    720
    Quote Originally Posted by Dlr Pyro View Post

    I don't believe states should receive any assistance or representation based off people illegally in those states and that is why the legal status question is important.
    Especially states with cities that declare themselves sanctuary cities and will not work with ICE.
    Not PTArmigan. Just Anti Anti-gun.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    7,425
    Democrats may rue the day they did this. The census could not be used against anyone who answered it, and it does not become public information for 70 years. There's no such guarantee with the information that comes from other ways.
    Liberals are divorced from reality and they think it's great. When you live in la la land you're never wrong, it's always the other person/groups fault and you can believe what you want to believe and call it 'truth'.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •