Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1 California Judge Puts National Block on Donald Trumpís Asylum Reform 
    Senior Member Banacek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Peoples Republic of Connecticut
    Posts
    13,046
    A California judge insists he has the authority to freeze a national asylum reform, despite an August decision by the pro-migration Ninth Court of Appeals which narrowed the judgeís reach to just California and Arizona.

    The block prevents President Donald Trumpís deputies from telling migrants they have to ask for asylum in the safe countries they travel through before they can apply for asylum in the United States. Trumpís first-safe-country policy matches international rules, but it is strongly opposed by elitist pro-migration groups, including the ACLU which has sued to block the reform because it would prevent most of the economic migrants from moving into blue-collar Americansí jobs, neighborhoods, and schools.

    The judge announced Monday that he was extending his blocking rules from his California region to aid the migrants who reach the border at Texas and New Mexico.
    Appointed by Barak

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...asylum-reform/
    Unknown philosopher at a St. Patrick's Day celebration 1967

    1 beer between 3 guys is better than no beers between no guys
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Power CUer FlaGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Swamps of N. Florida
    Posts
    27,680
    Quote Originally Posted by Banacek View Post
    And the 9th Circuit limited it to just the states in the 9th Circuit.

    A federal appeals court has put on hold a ruling that blocked a Trump administration policy that would prevent migrants from seeking asylum along the entire southwest border.

    The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay Tuesday that put the ruling by U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar on hold for now.

    That means the administrationís asylum policy is blocked in the border states of California and Arizona but not in New Mexico and Texas.
    Story here
    Cast your burden on the Lord,
    and he will sustain you;
    he will never permit
    the righteous to be moved.
    Psalm 55:22
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member old dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    the high desert
    Posts
    1,812
    I think the President should ignore this new "ruling" as bogus.

    The United States Navy, fighting Moslem barbarians since 1801.

    *****************************************
    Candace Owens for President 2024.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQgbN76AWrw
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Power CUer SVPete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    12,276
    Quote Originally Posted by FlaGator View Post
    And the 9th Circuit limited it to just the states in the 9th Circuit.

    Story here
    A double smack-down! By the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals! Whatever the appeals court's justices' opinions of Trump's policy, a district court's jurisdiction - authority to speak - is limited to the circuit in which the district court is located. Even the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals couldn't bring itself to permit this judge's attempted tyranny.
    Facts don't matter to DUpipo.

    BIG CHEETO Is Watching You!

    "Handmaid's Tale" is Christian-Bashing Hate Speech
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Power CUer FlaGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Swamps of N. Florida
    Posts
    27,680
    Quote Originally Posted by SVPete View Post
    A double smack-down! By the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals! Whatever the appeals court's justices' opinions of Trump's policy, a district court's jurisdiction - authority to speak - is limited to the circuit in which the district court is located. Even the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals couldn't bring itself to permit this judge's attempted tyranny.
    Trump adding the conservative justices to the 9th Circuit seems to be paying off.
    Cast your burden on the Lord,
    and he will sustain you;
    he will never permit
    the righteous to be moved.
    Psalm 55:22
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Power CUer SVPete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    12,276
    Quote Originally Posted by FlaGator View Post
    Trump adding the conservative justices to the 9th Circuit seems to be paying off.
    Two of the lib justices - Breyer and RBG, IIRC - joined in this decision. It should have been unanimous, because decisions by one circuit are not binding in other circuits unless Affirmed by the USSC. IMO, the USSC stepped in quickly in this case to avert one standard applying in the Ninth Circuit (particularly CA and AZ) and another in the rest of the country (particularly NM and TX).

    This decision did not decide the ACLU's, et al's lawsuit, it merely allowed Trump's policy be in force as the lawsuit is litigated. IMO, this whole situation - the district court judge overstepping his authority and doubling down after being smacked down the first time - is solid grounds for this judge being removed from the case for having demonstrated partiality.
    Last edited by SVPete; 09-12-2019 at 09:48 AM.
    Facts don't matter to DUpipo.

    BIG CHEETO Is Watching You!

    "Handmaid's Tale" is Christian-Bashing Hate Speech
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •