Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1 Nadler: A jury would convict Trump in 'three minutes flat' 
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    8,269
    link

    Nadler opens mouth and spews jack*ss shit.

    babylonsister (162,590 posts)

    Nadler: A jury would convict Trump in 'three minutes flat'

    Nadler: A jury would convict Trump in 'three minutes flat'

    By Rebecca Klar - 12/08/19 10:18 AM EST


    House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Sunday that he is confident in the case against President Trump ahead of a vote on impeachment.

    “We have a very rock-solid case,” Nadler said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

    “I think the case we have, if presented to a jury, would be a guilty verdict in about three minutes flat,” he added.


    The top Judiciary Democrat also dismissed Republicans' "nonsense about hearsay evidence," saying there is "considerable direct evidence."

    “And it ill behooves a president or his partisans to say you don’t have enough direct evidence when the reason we don’t have even more direct evidence is the president has ordered everybody in the executive branch not to cooperate with Congress in the impeachment inquiry, something that is unprecedented in American history and is a contempt of Congress by itself,” Nadler said. (And the remedy for disagreements between the executive and legislative branch is the court system, something Democrats decided not to do, probably because they KNEW they'd LOSE, so they can whine, like spoiled immature children all they want.)

    State of the Union @CNNSotu



    “We have a very rock solid case,” @RepJerryNadler says about the House Democrats' impeachment case. “The case we have if presented to a jury would be a guilty verdict in about three minutes flat.” https://cnn.it/2P2FShB #CNNSOTU




    228

    8:37 AM - Dec 8, 2019
    Twitter Ads info and priva
    121 people are talking about this
    Right. Democrats LIE all the time.

    1. What the jack*ss Nadler doesn't say is that the "jury" that would convict in 3 minutes flat would be rigged and consist of jack*sses like the three partisan hacks they put up front and center. The wouldn't have been put front and center if they weren't liberal hate filled partisan jack*sses.

    2. 75% or more of what the Democrats consider "evidence" is nothing but hearsay, presumption and second and third hand information that would NEVER see the inside of a court room. Nadler says they have "direct evidence" but they had NONE in their rigged impeachment inquiry. The jack*ss thinks people will be too dumb to know the difference as long as they lie and say it is "direct evidence". Might be true for Democrats. After all they are too dumb, ignorant and lazy to get an ID that is needed for many activities of daily living. It isn't true for most people.

    3. Jack*sses claim to have an airtight case, but they had to rig the impeachment inquiry so that they could hide anything that didn't aid their narrative. Then they put up 3 partisan jack*sss willing to do the Democrat butt f*ck; and their propaganda PIGS only showed the the butt f*cking and refused to show anything from the Republican's witness.

    4. Democrats are going to look like unhinged hate filled partisan hacks that no one sane will want to associate with if they keep contending that because President Trump didn't do the appropriate Democrat butt f*ck that he should be impeached. Because that's all it is. Democrats are butt hurt that they are not in power and THEIR AGENDA is not only not being enacted but the Black*ssed Jack*ss's "I don't need congress, I have a pen and phone" agenda is being torn down AND DEMOCRAT CORRUPTION is being revealed.
    Last edited by Carol; 12-08-2019 at 01:58 PM.
    Liberals are divorced from reality and they think it's great. When you live in la la land you're never wrong, it's always the other person/groups fault and you can believe what you want to believe and call it 'truth'.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #2  
    Senior Member Dan D. Doty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Pevely, Missouri
    Posts
    6,526
    The kind of case they're talking about is the ones that were old show trials in the Soviet Union , Red China and the old Communist Eastern Block. Where you get a State appointed lawyer ( who isn't really working for you, but the Government) , you're not allowed to present a case, call witnesses for the defense or present evidence.

    The Democrats are doing that now in the House, they're demanding to do the same thing in the Senate; you can't lose a trial if the defendant isn't allowed a chance to prove his innocence or mount a defense.

    If these guys get in control of all branches of Government, with no one stand in the way, expect the ghost of Stalin to pay us all a very frightening visit.
    CU's Paranormal Expert.


    Keep your powder dry, your sword sharp and your wits intact.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #3  
    Senior Member FDK's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,846
    A jury of senators won't convict him.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #4  
    Senior Member old dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    the high desert
    Posts
    2,171
    The democrats are conducting this as a made-for-tv-movie. If they dare send it to the Senate they will find out that they no longer control the script.

    The United States Navy, fighting Moslem barbarians since 1801.

    *****************************************
    Candace Owens for President 2024.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsCbLSqz85s
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #5  
    Senior Member FourWinds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,589
    I hope that dumpy little goblin get's burned severely on this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #6  
    Senior Member Zathras's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    San Jose, California
    Posts
    8,237
    Someone needs to inform Nadler the Hutt that hearsay evidence, which is what the impeachment evidence is, is not allowed in a court of law.
    Solve a man's problem with violence and help him for a day. Teach a man how to solve his problems with violence, help him for a lifetime - Belkar Bitterleaf

    Liberalism is what the stupid think is smart.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #7  
    eeeevil Sith Admin SarasotaRepub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    55,555
    Your Impeachment goes no where but
    Trump will win in a landslide in November.
    May the FORCE be with you!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #8  
    Festivus Moderator ralph wiggum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Springfield, USA
    Posts
    22,223
    The Penguin Nadler was misquoted: He meant to say in three minutes FAT.
    Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #9  
    Power CUer SVPete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    12,513
    Nadlerroo sez wut?
    Facts don't matter to DUpipo.

    BIG CHEETO Is Watching You!

    "Handmaid's Tale" is Christian-Bashing Hate Speech
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •